Name: JAMIZZLE ASZIZZLE
Location: WRECKEDSCUM
Date Posted: 17:29, 31 01 2009
Message: 'AC' IZA CUNT LULZ

Name: name
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 07:50, 01 09 2008
Message: Good day!,

Name: John Numbers
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 19:49, 23 02 2008
Message: Hello,people!
I like your resource very much!
I offer you the best freebies and free stuff site for your consideration.
The site has many useful categories containing useful information, it is being updated regularly, and has a mailing service. I hope the site will prove useful to many people and will save their time as well...
Usawebfreebies.com is the best free stuff, sweepstake and freebies site by the version of Yahoo, Google and MSN!
Yahoo, Google and MSN is the best search engines!

Name: Chris
Location: Rickmansworth
Date Posted: 13:41, 06 08 2007
Message: These awards are rubbish!

Is this site created for/by crap wannabe comedians who have constantly been turned down by the TV companies?

It would help if your writers actually had some comedy talent themselves if they're going to devote an entire website to trashing comedians.

Some of what you say is true, but people in glass houses...

Name: Wow
Location: London
Date Posted: 13:54, 13 07 2007
Message: You guys are way funnier than any of the people you mentioned. You online part-time journalists and failed comedians are actually a lot funnier than the professionals. Seriously why do you watch so much comedy if you hate it all. Can't you just have a laugh, or are you just jealous that most people find them funny and not you?

Name: p5
Location:
Date Posted: 19:26, 13 04 2007
Message: that was pretty painful

Name: Leonard Hatred
Location: Tring
Date Posted: 17:48, 21 03 2007
Message: Please can somebody kill Catherine Tate this year? I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

And 'Green Wing': why wasn't that pile of bollocks nominated in more categories?

Great awards ceremony, agreed with just about everything. Don't listen to the haters like this Andy arse below me, he obviously knows nowt. Look forward to the '07 awards.

Tommy Cooper 4 LIFE!

Name: Buttgammon
Location: A house somewhere, on foreign soil
Date Posted: 17:24, 09 01 2007
Message: Ouch! We're not that bad, are we?

Name: Andy
Location:
Date Posted: 00:39, 09 01 2007
Message: And the award for biggest pile of shit in between pointless awards goes to... this.

While I agree many of the shows included are crap, they dont come anywhere near to the complete and utter load of bollocks written here.

Next time, i wouldn't bother writing page 1, 2, 3 and 4 and just give the users comments and the awards, as they are by far the funniest bit here.

hah.

Name: Mr Creamy
Location: Interweb
Date Posted: 16:36, 08 01 2007
Message: wow, so much bile! so predictable! so cookdandbombd! what a bunch of dicks.

Name: romeish pumpkin
Location:
Date Posted: 15:55, 03 01 2007
Message: Some of the linking material was ok but the funniest thing on the site is the comment below: 'After you. Is it The Boosh or Russell Brand?' My gf and her friends fancy both and think this is the same as being funny. That cunt who presents buzzcocks now is another one.

Actually what comedy do you like, aside from stuff by Morris and Cook? Ironically, as satire and ironic black comedy is clearly pointless without a worthwhile target, in attacking Little Britain and Catherine Tate you make the same mistake as eg. Time Trumpet and HIGNFY as in satirising them you take such populist shite seriously. Clearly they are appalling, whats the point.

On the other hand, Mitchell and Webb's writing may be second rate but Peep Show is excellent largely thanks to them. The Boosh is harmless and good for chuckles (well the first series anyway), its not meant to be clever you know. Leave them alone.

Name: Mark Packham
Location: Edinburgh
Date Posted: 18:16, 02 01 2007
Message: I like the awards, especailly the drawings of people. I agree with the fact that The Simpsons should be put to sleep. Its got nowhere to go.

Name: Edmund Sexo
Location: Isle of Wight
Date Posted: 12:54, 31 12 2006
Message: heres a sznippet from my autobiography
Hello. I'm Edmund. Edmund Sexo. *holds out hand to shake*. I'm 85, and live in a magnolia bungalow on the isle of wight, that I've recently painted. Painted it last weekend acutally. Yeah. That's what I like doing at weekends. It's pretty fun. I either do that or pickle conkers in brine.
Anyway, I should really say that I'm a practising pedophile, and I'm proud of it, you shouldn't be afraid to show your sexuality. Some people, strangely think it's wrong for a man to love a child, for example the other day a policeman knocked on the door just after I'd had my weekly shower/soap up, I answered and he greeted me by saying "we've received information from a contact that you've been dating an 8 year old". Of course I was mefiant, so I replied with "You are mistaken, I am only giving him trombone lessons", this is when I shut the door in his face and returned to the salon, where Tony, the 8 year old, was laying on the sofa. I sat down next to him and looked up at the doorway. "ARE YOU STILL HERE?!" I bellowed, for the policeman was in fact, still there. This was rather an embarassing situation, because as I had sat down on the sofa, my bathrobe had got caught on a nearby doorknob, reveiling me in the altogether. And if you think that's bad enough, as it was so hot in the room where the sofa was, Tony had stripped down to his lether leopard skin tight thong.
This incident ended me up in court, and I received 40 years. Thankfully, I had a couple of airoplane tickets hidden in my moustache, so me and Tony managed to escape this misunderstanding and moved to a small island in the pacific, not much bigger than the one we used to live on. We don't like change.

AND I DONT LIKE THIS SITE AT ALL
exept for the justin lee collins and allan carr parts and little britian and catherine tate parts.

Name: Tjerk
Location: Yes
Date Posted: 22:05, 27 12 2006
Message: I am a bitterly dissapointed cunt and very proud to be one. I am glad to have found my equals in some of the folks who run this site and put the Tumbleweeds together. Thank you to all who put this together. Enjoyable read with great presentation.

Now on a more positive note, congratulations to all the award winners !

Name: Bruce
Location:
Date Posted: 09:20, 24 12 2006
Message: What a brilliantly designed site! Credit to everyone involved. Sadly I agree with everything. I hope some of the winning and nominated comedians read this site, take the criticism onboard and make 2007 a decent comedy year.

Name: Neil
Location: Testville
Date Posted: 02:51, 24 12 2006
Message: Just a test. Also, the E-cards are up and running, e-cards.

Name: Stephen Armstrong
Location:
Date Posted: 14:57, 23 12 2006
Message: distressingly, i agree with pretty much everything. suggesting you must be right about me being a wanker. I'll bid for worst critic of the year for 07.

Name: Tom
Location:
Date Posted: 13:34, 23 12 2006
Message: I agree with the thinking behind these awards but it's a shame that they are even more painfully unfunny than the comedy they criticise. Obvious targets, no wit or originality and no laughs to be had from anything better than playground sneering. Comedy might need rescuing but you lot aren't the ones to do on the basis of this.

Name: extradave
Location:
Date Posted: 16:27, 19 12 2006
Message: Nice one. Tittering away in the office to an extremely amusing read.

Name: strang
Location:
Date Posted: 12:12, 19 12 2006
Message:
"Did you enjoy writing it as much as last year's?"

Aye, had a blast.

Name: Liam
Location:
Date Posted: 10:50, 19 12 2006
Message: I'm surprised you've held another awards ceremony. It just feels so....forced.
Did you enjoy writing it as much as last year's?

Name: bomb dog
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 21:27, 18 12 2006
Message: Ace. Glad to see many of the nominees I would have voted for, won. Should have got around to voting sooner... next time.....

Name: Snowgrouse
Location:
Date Posted: 02:04, 18 12 2006
Message: Fantastic stuff. Will definitely be voting myself in '07. I'm with most of the people with Ricky Gervais being an utter cunt. This site cheered me up, I nearly shat meself laughing. Keep up the good work!

Name: Morgan Bowen
Location:
Date Posted: 23:22, 17 12 2006
Message: After skimming the results a couple of days ago I have just not-randomly sat down at my computer and not-randomly read the whole thing and I have ended up thinking "I must not-randomly express my concurrance"!

More than just comedy criticism, I think alot of what you've raised here - reactionary whimsy, (hair) style over content, plagarism+"delicously un-pcness"=creative - are interesting critiques against which a rejuvenating wave must kick!

To all those who are trotting out the familiar "don't be so sad..." line - if they can point towards anything written about contemporary cultural matters with this kind of unashamed passion for standards then link me up!

Name: Catalogue Trousers
Location:
Date Posted: 15:05, 17 12 2006
Message: Tim Rice: while I agree that Family Guy does have a certain percentage of rubbish, I still find it funnier and fresher than The Simpsons. I wonder if the main difference is that The Simpsons, in its earliest days certainly, is simply a very well-written and characterised sitcom which just happens to star cartoon charcters (outside of the occasional gag about yellow skin and four fingers, nothing is made of this in the earlier seasons). Even something like Deep Space: Homer is fairly believable in its basic plot - I could see NASA sending an average scmoe up on a shuttle mission as a PR exercise.

Family Guy, by contrast, is more an active and gleeful parody of sitcom from the word go. From the super-intelligent talking dog and baby who aren't as much as commented on, it's a joyous piss-take of the sitcom format.

As a result, it feels less awkward and "dishonest" when it resorts to gimmick-of-the-week plots. When The Simpsons does "Bart gets kidnapped by a monkey!!!!! LOLOLOLOL!", it just feels rather clumsy and desperate - especially when it isn't even the main plot, but gets hyped as such.

The Simpsons does deserve approving recognition, more for its past than its present: while Family Guy deserves approving recognition, but for being a general PARODY of sitcom, rather than a specific PLAGIARISM of The Simpsons.

Name: DJ One Record
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 15:02, 17 12 2006
Message: But Family Guy was never an amazing show in the way that The Simpsons was, so the fact that it's reaching stagnation in its sixth season is, I would argue, less important than the continuous plumbing of stagnation that a once essential show has now resorted to merely in the name of record breaking. That's why The Simpsons deserves the Tumblie over Family Guy.

Name: Tim Rice
Location:
Date Posted: 00:09, 17 12 2006
Message: Haha. To Neil, You have got me there. On the Gervais PR exercise. I haven't read that story about Arnie last I heard was that Gervais didn't want to do anymore. I guess I am now completely contradicting myself but I can definitely see where you are coming from with the Curb hybrid. He really didn't place the actors well enough and relied on cheap jokes. Concerning homophobia and dwarves.
About the simpsons thing Catalogue Trousers you are absolutely right. That Ali G reference was so pointless. That show was pretty bad parodying pimp my ride with an ice cream truck. What I was getting at though is although The Simpsons is rubbish Family Guy is also rubbish. What strikes me with Family Guy is that they are only in season 6 and it's already bad. It wasn't even funny when it came back on the air. I dont think The Simpsons really got awful til season 10. In the new seasons it's like Al Jean (the new/old showrunner) forgot what it was that made the early seasons he ran so great. Perhaps its the absence of John Swartzwelder in the writers room.
The only show of recent that I find myself watching over and over again on dvd is Arrested Development.
That show ticked every box on what a sitcom should be. That is, if im allowed to say it true 'Genius'.

Name: Neil
Location:
Date Posted: 18:49, 16 12 2006
Message: I've no problem with obvious influences, incidentally. I do have a problem with theft though, or with influences that are stripped of anything that made the original material interesting/funny/whatever. Extras is a perfect example there, Gervais wants to do a British Larry Sanders/Curb hybrid, but evidently has no interesting ideas on what to actually *do* with the celebrities. He's now circling a story that he'd like to have Arnie in the third series of Extras...and that says it all, really. De Niro and Arnie make it abundantly clear that he's mainly interested in who he can get, rather than what he can do with them. He should rename it to PR Excercise.

Name: Catalogue Trousers
Location:
Date Posted: 18:27, 16 12 2006
Message: Just a quick note to Tim Rice: The Simpsons is just as riddled with "non-sequitur" pointless zeitgeist-surfing gags as Family Guy, if not more so. What the hell was the point of that Ali G gag on last week's new episode, apart from using up a minute of screentime that could have been filled with something funny? And what's less of a plot than "Bart goes to a zoo and gets kidnapped by a monkey"? That's a pointless piece of plotless drivel as well. At least Family Guy feels funny and affable (even though it also is far from flawless).

Name: Neil
Location:
Date Posted: 18:23, 16 12 2006
Message: He said that Karl "may be the funniest man alive", and I wondered if he actually ranked them above the two men he previously ranked as "two of the greatest comedians that ever lived." I'm not trying to split hairs, that just seems to be the implicit suggestion in his post.

I think if you want to compare Larry David against Ricky Gervais, then it's rather fairer to do it taking into account the amount of episodes they've both written, rather than just the number of *series*. Seinfeld is an absolutely exceptional show, and Larry David set the tone for it, wrote an awful lot of episodes, controlled the tone of the show even when he *wasn't* writing episodes etc. It all shifted and started to go downhill the very moment he left. Ricky Gervais just isn't in the same league, I'm afraid.

Also, "a show about nothing" isn't entirely true as a description - the fact that it's ostensibly a show about nothing means that it can in fact be about *anything*.

I just don't think your comparisons are generally fair, Tim. "Mockumentaries" covers a very broad range of topics. What I'm getting at is that the main thing Gervais relies on is post-PC material. This is extremely evident in Extras, where the decent stuff from The Office was junked in favour of more (despicable) homophobia and other such crap. That's what I'm getting at when I call him limited, he's going for easy laughs all the time now, and that's filtering down and influencing hateful crap like Ting Tong Macadangdang.

Name: Tim Rice
Location:
Date Posted: 17:59, 16 12 2006
Message: First of all Neil, it seems to me that David didn't say that Gervais was the funniest man alive he said that Larry David and John Cleese are the funniest men alive.

Secondly, I agree with you that Ricky Gervais is very much a one note song. However we could also claim this about Larry David. I mean hes done 2 sitcoms.
Seinfeld - A show about nothing as it was described. Curb Your Enthusiasm - A show about nothing. Doesn't this make him also extremely limited? I mean he only writes shows which often dont end like a standard sitcom would.

Opinions Please.

To give another example the brilliant Christopher Guest. He writes mockumentaries and very well. He doesn't do much more than that.

Lastly, Chris Morris everything he has ever done is largely based around satire. The Day Today and Brass Eye being the two biggest achievements. Mock News programs.

Do all these people have limited talent?

I think it is the fact that most comedians just stick to what they know because they know it will work.

Your retort please, Neil

Name: Neil
Location:
Date Posted: 17:31, 16 12 2006
Message: Firstly, can we keep the crap viral accusations off this guestbook please.

Funniest man alive, David?! Funnier than Larry David or John Cleese?

Unfortunately, I find Gervais to be a one-hit wonder. Everything before and after The Office has been uniformly dreadful. His actual comedy writing is extremely limited to...he generally just hovers round that dull social faux-pas/comedy of embarrasment crap. Such limited talents aren't worthy of being described as "genius" as far as I'm concerned.

Name: David Piper
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 17:18, 16 12 2006
Message: Tim Rice is totally right about Gervais, you cannot say the man that brought us the office, and now extras is not pure genius. Ask Larry David, or John Cleese what they think of Gervais two of the greatest comedians that ever lived. As for the Gervais podcast then well its not really Rickys its about Karl who by the way is probably the funniest man alive.

To be honest we can all sit back and judge and say its crap but at the end of the day i dont really care wat people think, we should enjoy comedy which makes us laugh, and Gervais makes me laugh a lot.

Name: Someone who knows these things
Location:
Date Posted: 15:38, 16 12 2006
Message: Well, 'Annie', we don't enjoy yours...

Name: You First, Annie
Location:
Date Posted: 14:33, 16 12 2006
Message: "Let me ask you, what comedy DO you enjoy then? Hmm?"

After you. Is it The Boosh or Russell Brand?

Name: ffogems
Location:
Date Posted: 13:16, 16 12 2006
Message: Why are you guys being so negative about the Tumblies? Haven't you got anything better to do than to criticise? You sound so bitter! Anyway, it made me laugh and that's all one can ever ask for, eh.

Name: Annie
Location:
Date Posted: 10:16, 16 12 2006
Message: This website is a complete joke.

What a load of old bull I say. You're just ripping into every comedy show to try and be funny. But I'm not sorry to tell you that it just hasn't worked for you. I found your attempts to be witty in tearing apart the comedy shows alot worse than any cringing I may have done during any of said "terrible" comedies.

However, that being said, I do find the people who have signed the guestbook claiming that "comedy is in a terrible state" hilariously funny!
Do you not have anything better to do with your sad little lives than make a website ripping apart almost every comedy show from this year?

Let me ask you, what comedy DO you enjoy then? Hmm?

Name: Tim Rice
Location:
Date Posted: 03:34, 16 12 2006
Message: Theres a fine line between taking the piss and being a prick everyone hates. For example Mark Lamaar funny. This website not so funny.

That said you had it bang on the money last year with Catherine Tate I cannot stand that show and I cannot stand catchphrase comedy. Little Britain infuriates me and I can't stand the fact they keep winning awards for complete drivel.

The Gervais bashing is completely redundant. You say that he's just copying curb your enthusiasm. If you say that you're saying the Simpsons copied the Flintstones. The Flintstones copied The Honeymooners. It goes on, does it mean they are bad shows? I think not.

You gave The Simpsons worst international comedy, but I think you got that very wrong although simpsons is nothing like season 6 (the peak of its genius) there are far worse shows. It comes in the form of Family Guy. Season 1-3 brilliant. Ever since they have come back they have been fucking awful.The non sequiturs moments happen for no reason other than to crack a joke.

I have to disagree with you once again on The Ricky Gervais Show. Ricky doesn't really take part in a lot of it just laughs at the silly things that Karl comes up with. It really is the Karl Pilkington show. I don't download it to laugh at a stupid person I enjoy the way Karl thinks. His mind isnt cluttered with rules and logic, which is why people laugh, because he says things that no one would say. It's Rickys mate and he wants to show everyone why he thinks Karl is the funniest man in Britain.

However we are all entitled to our opinions. Although I can't see this tiny website creating a revolution of change in comedy. I'm not exactly sure what it is that you want changed but it won't stop the bigwigs up top giving comedy awards for shoddy work.
Perhaps its better if the creators of this site wrote a comedy, that we could all enjoy and shower it with awards. Surely though if we did that someone would include it in the worst comedy awards and then we are back at square 1.
So it begs the question, whats the point?

Name: Declan Curry
Location:
Date Posted: 17:06, 15 12 2006
Message: Amazing, you managed to say everything i think in an actual coherent, funny way.

I thougt I was all alone in my love comedy, and anguish in seeing something I love get torn apart.

Name: some twat in 1986
Location:
Date Posted: 16:49, 15 12 2006
Message: The people who make Spitting Image are clearly very talented, so why can't they use their talents to make something nice instead?

Name: John K
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 14:12, 15 12 2006
Message: Hmmm...You make a lot of really great points, and much of 2006's comedy has been absolutely appalling, and the comments made by the verbwhores often made me smile.

But much of the filler material and attempts at humour just weren't funny, infact I found myself cringing more at them than I would in an average episode of Extra's.

The amount of time spent making this must have been really quite considerable, rather than making something so negative, could you not have combined your creative juices in to making something more postive?

And is bad comedy really that important anyway? Considering the state of the world right now, wouldn't it have been better to volounteer for a charity or do something positive rather than sitting infront of your computers, ridiculing something that in the scheme of things is really rather unimportant?

Just an idea. I hope you're not offended by this.

Name: Banana Woofwoofwoof
Location:
Date Posted: 14:03, 15 12 2006
Message: I'm just glad someone gives enough of a shit to do something like this. I didn't even care enough about comedy to vote this year. Comedy is a huge part of my life but in 2006 I found one comedy (The IT Crowd) remotely funny. I am depressed by the state of comedy at the moment; I'm cheered by the fact that so many people care how bad it's become and wants it to change, and don't sit blindly nodding along to the new hidden-camera-mugging-camera-tits-badger fanny shit that we're forced to accept as The New Wave of Comedy.

Name: DJ One Record
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 12:51, 15 12 2006
Message: It is kind of depressing that more loving care and attention to detail has gone into an awards parody on a relatively obscure website than an entire year's worth of British television comedy. Sign of the times, eh?

Keep this up, guys. Hopefully someone in high places will take the lead from this kind of work and produce something that once again makes comedy worth watching.

Name: Ben
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 01:11, 15 12 2006
Message: I love this run down of all the comedies this year but IN REVERSE HA!

I love the way every comedy has been listed and commented on in such a witty way,

you're a bunch of cunts

hhahahaha

funny

Name: Buttgammon
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 22:21, 14 12 2006
Message: With British comedy in the state it is in, I think we need something like the Tumblies to really show that there are people out there that are interested in good TV comedy that aren't willing to just watch whatever bullshit Channel 4 and BBC 3 feed them. As for the claims we are 'nasty', we wouldn't need to be critical of these so called comedians if they actually stopped making such shit. And if you want nasty, watch Little Britain and see how racist that Ting Tong character is. Much of the humour in many 'comedies' at the moment is very similar to the stuff you would expect morons like Bernard Manning and Jim Davidson to come out with. I think we need to be critical of that kind of thing in the hope that some talented people will come along to the field of comedy and change it for the better. Otherwise, we will end up with things like this being enjoyed by masses of idiots who haven't seen anything decent in years and are just happy to watch anything vaguely funny. Or we could just kill Lucas and Wallliams, Ricky Gervais and Leigh Francis and blackmail all of the commissioners at the TV channels into only showing programmes which people at C&B actually consider funny.

Name: Cabbages And Bells
Location:
Date Posted: 20:28, 14 12 2006
Message: The Tumblies in 2005 bought Cookd and Bombd to my attention when a link was posted to them on Outpost Gallifrey, followed by lots of complaints about what a bunch of meanie weenies you were for saying nasty things about The Boosh etc etc.

While I am depressed that the standard of comedy has fallen so low across the board that I agree with them 100%, I am at least pleased that there are people out there who do give a shit about it.

An entertaining read, with extra marks awarding for insulting Nev Fountain in the Arrivals section. Even mediocrity as obscure as his deserves to be recognise.

Name: Slaaaaabs
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 20:18, 14 12 2006
Message: Superb work. Genuinely funny throughout, downright hilarious in places.

For every idiot that uses this guestbook to cry about it being "nasty" I hope there are ten more that understand and accept the overall message.

Name: Oliver Levy
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 19:24, 14 12 2006
Message: An Epic Thing. And what a beautiful Lazarou to pull. It's one of those web-based endeavours you want to print out and bind up and distribute to all your family and friends.

Name: Bert Thung
Location:
Date Posted: 19:04, 14 12 2006
Message: Great work

I was thinking Ian Collins on Talksport criticising the British Comedy Awards might make these views border on mainstream. But alas, the usual banal retorts of bitterness make me think otherwise. Or is it these panicky wallies losing touch with public opinion?

Whatever the case, if they don't respect passionate opinions they can shove there chill pills and lagers up there fucking arses.

Name: Morgan
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 18:08, 14 12 2006
Message: Sorry, what I meant to say was: get a fucking life lads, it's only comedy.

Name: Kit
Location:
Date Posted: 18:07, 14 12 2006
Message: Fucking excellent.
Congratulations to all.

Name: Morgan Daniels
Location: [email protected]
Date Posted: 18:07, 14 12 2006
Message: I'm just annoyed about the fact that one of my comments contains the word 'actually' twice.

Name: C J Davies
Location:
Date Posted: 17:42, 14 12 2006
Message: Jesus, guys - the serious amount of time that has been put into this is impressive. Now if only a tenth of our so-called comedy 'writers' could put in the same workload, we might actually pull ourselves out of this light-entertainment netherworld, eh?

Name: Neil
Location:
Date Posted: 17:35, 14 12 2006
Message: Heh, this is very quickly going to fill up with a load of people bitterly moaning and whining about how it's awful to be negative, isn't it.

Name: Martha Wash
Location:
Date Posted: 17:33, 14 12 2006
Message: Only skimmed the first couple of pages, but I'm sure the rest of it is pretty much the same: basically a collection of not-very-funny digs at the usual targets. I could be wrong although I doubt it.

Admittedly, a hell of a lot of time and effort has gone into it, but I can't help feeling that maybe you should have left last year's effort as a stand alone one-off project. I hope you're not planning on doing one of these every year because spiteful comments dressed up as '...a light-hearted look at...etc' can get really rather tiresome, as it has on this occasion. Sorry fellas, this sort of stuff really doesn't do it for me.

Anyway I give as much of a shit about your site as I'm sure you do about my comments and opinions - and as the pleasure of this will be all yours...enjoy!

Merry Christmas.

Name: Rootin\\\' Tootin\\\' Raspberry
Location:
Date Posted: 17:27, 14 12 2006
Message: yo d lurkin man you was obviously sittin here waitin for the results to go up, jokes on you dude

Name: Jack Anderton
Location:
Date Posted: 16:58, 14 12 2006
Message: The motivation behind these awards is fully justified. People like 'D Lurking' would like to convince you that caring about things you care about is so uncool- it's like such a hassle man!! Fuck them- Caring a great deal about something you care a great deal about IS something worth praising. In this case we have the full justified destruction of the worst year for British comedy ever, and the destruction of the fuckwits responsible for its performance and its products. Bravo! An excellent piece of work.

There will only be criticism from people who can't take it when one program they enjoy is discarded. I didn't agree with some of the Mitchell & Webb criticism but it didn't stop me enjoying the rest of the awards. Once again, great work.

Name: D Lurking
Location:
Date Posted: 16:25, 14 12 2006
Message: Get yourselves some professional help. The fact that you've put so much time and effort into nastiness and negativity isn't something to be proud of. It should worry you. Find some perspective, move on, and enjoy your short time on this earth, or one day you'll look back and think, 'Oops, I seem to have wasted my life being bitter and twisted about other people instead of shrugging my shoulders and leading a full life of my own.' Anger isn't always righteous and constructive; sometimes, as with the bile displayed in these awards, it's just petty and spiteful. You're not grumpy sixth formers. You should have outgrown this attitude years ago.

Name: The Queen
Location:
Date Posted: 15:05, 14 12 2006
Message: I declare this guestbook...OPEN.

Name: Neil
Location:
Date Posted: 15:04, 14 12 2006
Message: Just testing...

INTRO

ARRIVALS

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3

PAGE 4