ctd...
______________
What I do know is that all day long I have heard everything about this bin Laden guy except this one fact -- WE created the monster known as Osama bin Laden!
Where did he go to terrorist school? At the CIA!
Don't take my word for it -- I saw a piece on MSNBC last year that laid it all out. When the Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan, the CIA trained him and his buddies in how to commits acts of terrorism against the Soviet forces. It worked! The Soviets turned and ran. Bin Laden was grateful for what we taught him and thought it might be fun to use those same techniques against us.
We abhor terrorism -- unless we're the ones doing the terrorizing.
We paid and trained and armed a group of terrorists in Nicaragua in the 1980s who killed over 30,000 civilians. That was OUR work. You and me.
Thirty thousand murdered civilians and who the hell even remembers!
We fund a lot of oppressive regimes that have killed a lot of innocent people, and we never let the human suffering THAT causes to interrupt our day one single bit.
We have orphaned so many children, tens of thousands around the world, with our taxpayer-funded terrorism (in Chile, in Vietnam, in Gaza, in Salvador) that I suppose we shouldn't be too surprised when those orphans grow up and are a little whacked in the head from the horror we have helped cause.
Yet, our recent domestic terrorism bombings have not been conducted by a guy from the desert but rather by our own citizens: a couple of ex-military guys who hated the federal government.
From the first minutes of today's events, I never heard that possibility suggested. Why is that?
Maybe it's because the A-rabs are much better foils. A key ingredient in getting Americans whipped into a frenzy against a new enemy is the all-important race card. It's much easier to get us to hate when the object of our hatred doesn't look like us.
Congressmen and Senators spent the day calling for more money for the military; one Senator on CNN even said he didn't want to hear any more talk about more money for education or health care -- we should have only one priority: our self-defense.
Will we ever get to the point that we realize we will be more secure when the rest of the world isn't living in poverty so we can have nice running shoes?
In just 8 months, Bush gets the whole world back to hating us again. He withdraws from the Kyoto agreement, walks us out of the Durban conference on racism, insists on restarting the arms race -- you name it, and Baby Bush has blown it all.
The Senators and Congressmen tonight broke out in a spontaneous version of "God Bless America." They're not a bad group of singers!
Yes, God, please do bless us.
Many families have been devastated tonight. This just is not right. They did not deserve to die. If someone did this to get back at Bush, then they did so by killing thousands of people who DID NOT VOTE for him!
Boston, New York, DC, and the planes' destination of California -- these were places that voted AGAINST Bush!
Why kill them? Why kill anyone? Such insanity.
Let's mourn, let's grieve, and when it's appropriate let's examine our contribution to the unsafe world we live in.
It doesn't have to be like this.
Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com <mailto:mmflint@aol.com>
I already put this up on the WW3 thread, but I guess it deserves a thread of its own.
The one positive thing we can hope for is that this turns round Bush's view of the world.
His attitude to Kyoto, for example, seemed to imply he thought he could opt out of his membership of the global community.
Now, when he needs all the friends he can get, he might be viewing things a little differently.
With great power comes great responsibility and, until now, he was showing no signs of taking it.
I'm praying. And I don't even believe in god.
>I already put this up on the WW3 thread, but I guess it deserves a thread of its own.
Fair enough. I'd just received a copy privately and simply don't have the time to read the latest messages on the WW3 thread, as much as I'd like to. I hope no one minds the duplication. I think it has enough value to justify it.
bin laden trained by the cia? pah! you'll be telling us next that gadaffi went to sandhurst.
er...
>The one positive thing we can hope for is that this turns round Bush's view of the world.
>His attitude to Kyoto, for example, seemed to imply he thought he could opt out of his membership of the global community.
>Now, when he needs all the friends he can get, he might be viewing things a little differently.
>With great power comes great responsibility and, until now, he was showing no signs of taking it.
>I'm praying. And I don't even believe in god.
In the last two days the world has got a new leader - he isn't an airhead like Bush or Blair or Straw - his name is Colin Powell and he appears to be taking all the decisions that count in Washington.
He is a military man, so he knows how to fight, but he's also a diplomat and intellectual who knows the limitations of fighting. Up until now he's been ssidelined in the administration - especially in his desire to curb Israel - by right wing thugs like Cheney. Since this crisis they've disappeared.
Powell will put on the fireworks to please everyone - indeed he's already talked of war - but then just as surely he'll go about applying peace.
I really don't see that you can begin to compare Bush to Blair. Blair's response in the last two days has been measured, thoughtful and smart. Bush meanwhile has looked like a rabbit in the headlights.
I agree about Powell though - he is quite a reassuring presence.
"In the last two days the world has got a new leader - he isn't an airhead like Bush or Blair or Straw - his name is Colin Powell and he appears to be taking all the decisions that count in Washington."
On the tube home on Monday night, I found a bit of the previous day's Sunday Times. In it was an article about how Powell was isolated within the administration.
But that's nothing (for unfortunate timing) compared to the editorial in the Sun I'd read earlier that day (gist: we're better off today than in the terrible Cold war, when there was a threat of nuclear war).
I'm reminded of those Daily Mail editorials praising Chamberlain in 1938.