Coogan Posted Sun Aug 5 23:42:47 BST 2001 by 'Peter O'Toasterblast'

What are those video tapes on Iannucci's desk?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bent Halo on Sun Aug 5 23:59:31 BST 2001:

Coogan shows with the correct dates, we can only hope.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Chet Morton' on Mon Aug 6 10:58:31 BST 2001:

I enjoyed it, although it would be nice to have had more on the writing / recording / formation of On The Hour. The behind the scenes material on I'm A.P. was particularly good, espceially the way they wrote material - Coogan improvising on film, then incorporating that into the script.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Martin on Mon Aug 6 10:59:35 BST 2001:

Bollocks, I clean forgot this was on. Is it being repeated?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Venga' on Mon Aug 6 11:42:23 BST 2001:

>I enjoyed it, although it would be nice to have had more on the writing / recording / formation of On The Hour.

Did anyone else notice that Morris wasn't mentioned by name once? Bizarre.

That's like filming a Lou Reed docu and omitting any explicit references to Andy Warhol.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'netgit' on Mon Aug 6 13:02:58 BST 2001:

>Did anyone else notice that Morris wasn't mentioned by name once? Bizarre.

>That's like filming a Lou Reed docu and omitting any explicit references to Andy Warhol.

Or like filming a Steve Coogan docu and omitting any explicit references to Chris Morris .

PS - Peter Baynham looks plastic.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Anonymous' on Mon Aug 6 16:03:53 BST 2001:


>PS - Peter Baynham looks plastic.
>


and patrick marber was on scag..

i cant leave my name cause i mighnt get done


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Anonymous' on Mon Aug 6 16:36:07 BST 2001:

did anyone catch any subtle hinting at TDTD2?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bean Is A Carrot on Mon Aug 6 16:44:26 BST 2001:

Coogan's on the cover of Time Out this week. Anyone read it yet?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Mon Aug 6 17:03:09 BST 2001:

Yes, I have. Quite interesting.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mogwai on Mon Aug 6 17:24:39 BST 2001:

Thanks for that.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Steve Berry on Tue Aug 7 11:21:37 BST 2001:

I thought Patrick Marber looked quite handsome and not at all smug (as I had expected him to seem). I don't particularly think that Marber's the best actor ever but all his KMKY characters seemed to be really self-satisfied and sneery. What with that and Stewart Lee's opinions of him expressed here, I had really not expected him to seem so reasonable and pleasant-sounding. But what do I know, eh?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By velvet on Tue Aug 7 13:01:55 BST 2001:

going back to Mr Baynham, he didn't look very well did he? I hope the little love is alright........

It was a good SBS i thought, Coogan was a really good interviewee and quite candid in places i thought.

sorry this post is a bit away from the way the thread is going, but i was out all day yesterday and i wasnted to say it was good.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'tvspaulmoore' on Tue Aug 7 14:16:25 BST 2001:

I thought it was a terrible programme. Simplistic in structure and style and offering no real insight into the man himself.

Ah well. That's yer modern SBS.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mogwai on Tue Aug 7 15:24:31 BST 2001:

>going back to Mr Baynham, he didn't look very well did he?

I'm so used to thinking of him as "Peter" in Fist Of Fun that seeing him with a tan is very disorienting.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By velvet on Tue Aug 7 15:41:48 BST 2001:

i know what you mean, i felt his technicolor appearance on the SBS was so weird, but then i had just drunk a bottle of red wine........


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Jimmy Durante' on Tue Aug 7 21:52:22 BST 2001:

Yeah, but Baynham is still funnier than YOU LOT, no matter what he LOOKS like.

Goodbye SOTCAA nazis.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'paul twist' on Tue Aug 7 22:20:54 BST 2001:

>I thought Patrick Marber looked quite handsome and not at all smug (as I had expected him to seem).

I thought Patrick Marber looked like Richard Herring. I think he wants to be Richard Herring, with his plays and his comedy and all that.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By velvet on Wed Aug 8 13:51:49 BST 2001:

>Yeah, but Baynham is still funnier than YOU LOT, no matter what he LOOKS like.
>
>Goodbye SOTCAA nazis.

we'll be seeing you at the drink then?

twit.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Brain Tree' on Thu Aug 9 20:04:52 BST 2001:

Did you see the permanent smug smile on Marber's face whats he so happy about? He hasn't worked for donkeys years!


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Bob Honey' on Fri Aug 10 13:55:10 BST 2001:

Apart from the play he wrote and directed at the National Theatre, and taking Closer to Broadway. Lazy bastard.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'jayne' on Fri Aug 10 15:01:58 BST 2001:

I was introduced to someone yesterday as 'he's the brother-in-law of that playwright that you hate - the one who used to be the crap stand-up' - I leave it to you all to work out who they meant.

I missed this so can anyone tell me if Henry Normal was on it and what his contribution was. We all have a strange obsession in life and the diminuative mancunian poet turned writer has always been mine.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Darren LeRoy Halford' on Fri Aug 10 15:03:13 BST 2001:

While the scenery and weather in Thailand is fantastic I am now hugely upset to have missed something about Coogan. What was it? A docu and what was the content?


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mogwai on Fri Aug 10 15:58:21 BST 2001:

> can anyone tell me if Henry Normal was on it and what his contribution was

Yes. He talked a bit about how Coogan's various characters had developed, but to be honest I wasn't listening too carefully to what he said as I was too mesmerised by the fact that he sounds EXACTLY like Bill Oddie.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'jayne' on Fri Aug 10 16:39:14 BST 2001:

He does not sound like Bill Oddie - cheek.

In fact I have two of his poems stuck on my wall in front of me to remind me of him.

I am 35 years old.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Rob Jones' on Fri Aug 10 22:12:35 BST 2001:

He DOES sound like Bill Oddie. I was thinking the same thing while watching the Coogan SBS. Henry Normal is obviously a made up name. I smell conspiracy.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Squidy' on Fri Aug 10 23:09:55 BST 2001:

Of course, 'normal' is the opposite of 'odd(ie)'.

Coincidence? (yes)


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'jayne' on Sat Aug 11 12:10:11 BST 2001:

I could bore you with the depth of my obsession by telling you his real name and various personal details - nah !!

He does not sound like Bill Oddie - I still have all of Encyclopedia Poetica on tape to prove this and he has signed all my books of his poetry.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mogwai on Sat Aug 11 12:32:19 BST 2001:

>He does not sound like Bill Oddie

The similarity is more pronounced than I ever remember it on Packet Of Three. Then he was just a bit husky. Now - and if you'd seen the programme you'd have had to have agreed [grammar] - it's Bill Oddie. Only better looking.


Subject: Re: Coogan [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'oil me' on Sat Aug 11 19:17:39 BST 2001:

In his radio interview, Coogan said there was to be a vehicle for Alan Partridge "some time next year"; considering this was recorded last year, when are we going to see Alan's show? (and don't say IAP was crap)


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]