Actually, there's a point - is there a url for this forum so I can get to it without the intrusive flashbits on the side? Tried http://mudhole.spodnet.uk.com/~frogger/cforum/ but it's just blank. Bet it's some kind of a ploy to stop me getting in, innit?

Ah. http://mudhole.spodnet.uk.com/~frogger/corpses/forum/


(Hello)

Hello subbes. I'm so glad you're here.

I can taste the sarcasm.


(has anyone told RHC this place exists? Ahem.)

Is it anything like Joe4SOTCAA's ass on the palate?

No, I didn't hear that. Just a bad dream or something.

Have you read the FRV article in Comment, Kinder? Should be right up your fictional alley.

She luuuurves you, Joe. She wants your baaaaabies.

>She luuuurves you, Joe. She wants your baaaaabies.

Kinder is incapable of love, Subbes.

Probably because the bloke who invented her isn't very good at writing parts for women.

Misogyinst! To you any female who shows any sort of class has to have a man behind her doesn't she?

Otherwise your plateau collapses.

No Kinder - you sound like an idiot bloke doing a bad impression of a female. Misogyny doesn't enter into it.

And downward we spiral...

>No Kinder - you sound like an idiot bloke doing a bad impression of a female. Misogyny doesn't enter into it.

And why pray tell can I not simply be an idiot girl doing a bad impression of a female?

Answer that one punk.

>And why pray tell can I not simply be an idiot girl doing a bad impression of a female?

Either way you're insincere.

Not really. It's neither here nor there. Unless Russell Peters finds out, then I'm buggered.

>Not really. It's neither here nor there. Unless Russell Peters finds out, then I'm buggered.

Aha - so I hit the nail on the head then?

She's a very badly-trained parrot. Obv.

>Aha - so I hit the nail on the head then?

Russell won't be pleased with that analogy.

kinder surprise is a female impersonator?

a text-only drag act?