Oversentimentalised news reports.

Old people and children in busy shopping centres. There's just no need for it.

Similar to Suiii.

People who don't go to work going into town at lunchtime and getting in my way.

Unemployed people, students, pensioners, children, the lazy, ladies who lunch and have nothing better to do, etc

Why can't they just go to town and leave before noon, or go in after 2pm?

This would have the great advantage of saving me time, and spreading shop-workers' load of work

People who own copyrights from preventing the public from accessing material while they are pointlessly failing to make it available.

Not just Yoakum. There's millions of other offenders out there...

I know it's obvious but:
The Daily Mail

kids

Live Forum Events

idneats

Ah, EVIL TJ. Nice to hear from you again.

>Live Forum Events

Message number bleedin' 7. How did it take so long?

>Ah, EVIL TJ. Nice to hear from you again.

Ok, so I did that one. Just thought a revival was in order.

I got the idea of stealing someone else's old jokes and repackaging them in a lacklustre fashion from a book by some American gentleman. His name escapes me right now.

People who take their kids on protest marches and give them little baby-banners to wave. Makes my blood boil.

The labour party

The conservative party

intelligent life

Idiot students who shout "WASSSSSSSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPP" to their idiot student friends in a very loud voice rather early in the morning on a bus that I happen to be on, like it's a really funny thing or something.

People who say "The special effects on Dr Who are rubbish."

Robbie bleedin' Williams

People who post under more than one alias.

People who say "I just can't function without my caffeine fix."

People who use the phrase "sad individual". Yes, you Jo Whiley.

Jo Whiley

Snow that falls when it's too warm for it to settle, but instead melts halfway down from the sky, basically making very very fuckin' cold rain.

Records of people going "WAAASSSSSSUUUUUUP" that feature the backing track to MC Hammer's "Can't Touch This".

People who tarnish all students with the same brush, branding them lazy, going-into-town-at-lunchtime and wasssuuuuuup-shouting types. We're not all like that.

The Sun, The Mirror, The News of the World and most importantly The Daily Mail.

People who walk against the flow in tube stations.

People who camp out in the middle of the pavement with pushchairs and shopping to help their kids open sweets.

americanised spellings of words.

>americanised spellings of words.

It's spelt 'americanized', silly!

smart arses.

scruffy arses

People who pronounce 'Tune' as 'Chown'.

People who say: "It's political correctness gone mad."

>People who tarnish all students with the same brush, branding them lazy, going-into-town-at-lunchtime and wasssuuuuuup-shouting types. We're not all like that.

If you noticed, I specified "idiot students", not students in general, which would be a pretty stupid thing to whinge about considering I am a student myself.

Fucking whining students, eh?

The word 'unputdownable' (that's for Joe)

banning things

Overreacting when I call you ignorant scum.

Unless you *are* ignorant scum, obv.

ok ok then, dictionary brained clever girl.

what is ignorance??

i'd love for you to tell me, cos then i'd hump it like a poodle, on an old ladies shin.

and after:

in a corpse basket, ready to fill the 'O'z @ sky.

urmff
Avant garde cleches

>what is ignorance??

It's irony gone mad.

Sorry.

I would like to ban dogs from pooing. ANYWHERE, EVER.

>I would like to ban dogs from pooing. ANYWHERE, EVER.

But eventually they'd explode and it would be really messy.

I'd like to ban students fucking about with the computers at the college where I work, thereby making needless extra work for me, restoring them to health (the computers, not the students) when I could otherwise be busy reading this forum ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H doing important work in my office.

Was that specific enough? No offence to students at any other educational establishments is intended. (N.B. if any of my students are reading this, stop abusing the facilities and do some work, you lazy little gobshites.)

>>what is ignorance??
>
>It's irony gone mad.


irony = ignorance, there was a short time when it wasn't... but that was many many moons ago, on the gay planet known as 'Austin Powers 80's wank'

what AM i on about??

too shy shy, hush hush eye to eye.

>I'd like to ban students fucking about with the computers at the college where I work, thereby making needless extra work for me, restoring them to health (the computers, not the students) when I could otherwise be busy reading this forum ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H doing important work in my office.
>
>Was that specific enough? No offence to students at any other educational establishments is intended. (N.B. if any of my students are reading this, stop abusing the facilities and do some work, you lazy little gobshites.)

The same goes for the students here that think it's somehow a good idea to put large magnets on the screens, break of the disk drive doors, steal the tracking balls from the mice (resulting in sterile mice) and putting permenant black marker pen on the keyboards.

>People who take their kids on protest marches and give them little baby-banners to wave. Makes my blood boil.

Absolutely - the kids don't know what its about. Are they really saying "My son has made an informed decision and thinks this" - or course not, they are using their kids as camera fodder.

It is especially bad when the parents are going after some innocent person who has the misfortune to be a paediotrician or something similar.

Ban this filth!

http://www.scatbabes.com

>>People who take their kids on protest marches and give them little baby-banners to wave. Makes my blood boil.
>
>Absolutely - the kids don't know what its about. Are they really saying "My son has made an informed decision and thinks this" - or course not, they are using their kids as camera fodder.
>
>It is especially bad when the parents are going after some innocent person who has the misfortune to be a paediotrician or something similar.
>
Why thank you - nice to be agreed with. Not sure they're using their kids as camera fodder so much as a sort of moral trump card. The minute anyone invokes children as an issue they become un-contradictable somehow... "Look! My opinions are more valid than yours because I've managed to reproduce, just like every other polycellular life-form on the fucking planet.">

See also people who use pushchairs as battering rams in marketplaces and shops. They really love their fucking kids, don't they?

See also people who take their kids to shopping centres and constantly beat them around the head or let them scream incessantly. And, dolewhores who swan about said shopping centres in the latest designer gear, with new mobile phones, while their kids have to make do with shitty rags crudely stitched together.

Continuing the theme: Working-class people in general, but more specifically those who buy their jewellery at Argos.

>Continuing the theme: Working-class people in general

Er, no. Working-class people in general are the millions who just get their heads down and get on with it, not the cheats and slackers who make the most noise. But let's not go there.

It's not a working class phenomenon, even if the most potent recent example has to be those anti-paedophile fuckwits on that estate in Portsmouth... yeah, giving them a banner with the word "kill" on it, you're really interested in the moral welfare of your offspring, aintcha.
Far more common are the purportedly liberal types who drag their winkies along on supposedly right-on demos, for causes which I as a fellow bleeding-heart pinko would support wholeheartedly if they weren't using two-year olds as human shields against armoured riot police. "Think of the children! Think of the children!" YOU think of the children, you're the ones who are gonna get them tear-gassed...

Oh dear, I've started something here with the ban working-class people thing.

It was only a spot of fun.

Of course, I don't want to ban them. I don't know where I'd be without Char. She's been an absolute find. The Earl Grey incident notwithstanding (can you imagine?) she's been a treasure. And I do enjoy chatting to her occasionally. How she manages whole conversations without recourse to the letter H is beyond me.

Then there's my landscape gardeners, Adrian and Julian. They're a bit nouveau riche, which is a sort of working class, isn't it? Their taste is rather vulgar (pine furniture, BMWs, you know the sort of thing) but they do amuse me and they certainly know the best place to plant a hibiscus.

for 'working class,' read 'from essex.' all is clear that way. and we don't insult the working class to boot.

essex should be banned.

j xxx

ps. anyone else think evil clown gas bottle whatsit is a genius? (i'm being fairly sincere here, by the way.)

for 'working class,' read 'from essex.' all is clear that way. and we don't insult the working class to boot.

essex should be banned.

j xxx

ps. anyone else think evil clown gas bottle whatsit is a genius? (i'm being fairly sincere here, by the way.)

aaaaargh!

I live in Essex, although I do agree, much like the eighties it should be banned.

The whole paedophile issues made me feel more sorry for the paedophiles. I know this is wrong, but they are humans too.

I feel that I am wrong in dismissing all working class as wrong. Which makes me an idiot. It is so hard sometimes...
The issues which concern children foremost often tend to overlook the opinions of the child, and often that child will be swayed by their parents opinions.

It is a long and dark road.

You're wrong, older men who take advantage of young naive children should be shut up in prison, pity Boothby is still a free man.

grrrrr, not what I meant at all.

They are mentally ill to be doing that sort of stuff and should be treated rather than destroyed. I hardly thinklocking someone away for good and never even trying to help them will ever make the world a better place.
just an empty one.

You're beautiful, Radiator...

>They are mentally ill to be doing that sort of stuff and should be treated rather than destroyed.

It's hardly unlikely that the treatment is going to work, though. Very idealistic to think that they ought to be treated, but the chances of re-offending are high whether they're merely locked up or treated while locked up. Paedophilia falls under the headings of fetishes (albeit a very extreme one) and they're incredibly difficult to control - no drugs as yet work upon the urges, unless you dose em up with morphia so they don't have a cogent thought in their heads, and therapy ain't gonna get the leanings out.

Inevitably, they will always have this problem, but it depends whether they can control it or not. If they're incapable of controlling it then it's best that they be kept where they can't harm any children [and also that no parents can harm THEM]. Wherever they go, they're gonna be hounded - more so in prison, from what I've heard. Paedophiles are generally worse treated than rapists by the other inamates.

I say we send em all to deserted island. Like the Isle Of Man.


ahem.

[if you can read past the typos there, of course. I should have 'subbed' it before I hit post.]

Paedophilia, like any paraphilia (extreme sexual fetish) is pretty much there for good once it starts. I'm slightly opposed to keeping them in prison mostly because it costs a fucking great deal of money. But subbes is indeed right that in 99% of cases treatment just simply does not work. Paedophiles have the highest rates of recidivism, and living in an open community is often simply too much for them, so a locked ward or prison is the best option all round. Perhaps we should, as subbes recommends, send them somewhere they can do no harm, like Middlesborough, although now I mention it......

> Perhaps we should, as subbes recommends, send them somewhere they can do no harm, like Middlesborough, although now I mention it......


Tell em if it's wearing a tracksuit, it's fair game.



</flippant>

>You're beautiful, Radiator...

Very sharp, Joe!

>Tell em if it's wearing a tracksuit, it's fair game.
>

'Boro is chock full of nappyrippers anyway. Ugh.

"People who take their kids on protest marches and give them little baby-banners to wave. Makes my blood boil."

Perhaps they just can't afford/find babysitters?

Or do you think only middle-class parents or single people should be allowed to publicly express an opinion?

>"People who take their kids on protest marches and give them little baby-banners to wave. Makes my blood boil."
>
>Perhaps they just can't afford/find babysitters?

That'd be fair enough, but it don't give them an excuse to freak 'em up for the cameras, does it? The point is that some people are *deliberately* taking their kids to these things to give it some kind of gravitas. Yeah, fucking nice one - make your point by putting your kids into a potentially hostile, confrontational situation. They'll love you for it.

I'd like to ban Alison Graham for fairly obvious reasons.

> Paedophilia, like any paraphilia (extreme sexual fetish) is pretty much there for good once it starts. I'm slightly opposed to keeping them in prison mostly because it costs a fucking great deal of money.

This makes me feel ill, that people put money above other's welfare. Fair enough taxes aren't great, but I think we have the best system in the world. So far.

>This makes me feel ill, that people put money above other's welfare.

You're going to have to learn to live with it though..

(I also don't think it was really the point Suiii was making)

>
>>This makes me feel ill, that people put money above other's welfare.
>
>You're going to have to learn to live with it though..
>
>(I also don't think it was really the point Suiii was making)
I know I know it just pisses me off, discrimination and all... people don't think things through, in the long run they will regret what they say.

I'd thought it through quite thoroughly thank you very much. I've stuck up for you in the past RHC but quite frankly I think you're very misguided on this one. Why the Hell should my tax pay to 'rehabilitate' paedophiles (it cannot be done, it's been proved time and again) when schools are chronically underfunded and our public health system is suffering from a severe lack of cash? The thing is, although a great deal of people may be sexually attracted to children, they don't act on it, they have enough self control to not do it. Anyone who actively seeks out children in order to sexually assault and rape them is wrong in the head. The thing is, given a choice between chemotherapy for someone dying of cancer, and so called 'rehabilitation' for paedophiles, I know which one I'd go for.

OK, so you may not agree, but from what you've posted here it appears that you're way out of your depth on this. I'm lucky enough not to have been raped or abused, but I know people who have and when you see first hand the effects of child sexual abuse on an entire family, it certainly puts the issue into perspective.

paedophiles. simple. fit them with sprinklers.

j xxx

ps. bean - thank you for alison graham. xxx

right then.
ok.
fine.

Ban leaving half-eaten food lying around in McDonalds/Burger King. If there's one thing guaranteed to turn my stomach even more than actually eating the damn stuff, it's that. Also ban McDonalds/Burger King.

>You're beautiful, Radiator...

When you fall over in the snow, do you make a couple of bumps?

....twirly.....

...it's as easy as that.

I meant 'beautiful' in the old West Coast hippy sense there, obviously...

Ahem...

>paedophiles. simple. fit them with sprinklers.
>
>j xxx
>
>ps. bean - thank you for alison graham. xxx

hazeley - At last, someone who agrees with me. And I thought people cared about TV on this Forum!