SOTCAA was shit Posted Mon Nov 20 13:58:03 GMT 2000 by Mogwai

Well it was.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Stuart O' on Mon Nov 20 13:59:25 GMT 2000:

Quiet round here today.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Anonymous' on Mon Nov 20 14:03:14 GMT 2000:

>Quiet round here today.

Gosh. Wonder why.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Richard' on Mon Nov 20 15:37:42 GMT 2000:

I wasn't parodied on the previous thread, probably because I contribute more to non-comedy threads.

I suppose I'm happier not being parodied


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Mon Nov 20 17:49:03 GMT 2000:

I have breasts.










[self-parody. The lowest point...]


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Richard' on Mon Nov 20 18:34:32 GMT 2000:

>I have breasts.
Chicken or Turkey? How do you plan on cooking them?


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Mon Nov 20 18:47:07 GMT 2000:

I'm going to marinate them in honey.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Arma on Mon Nov 20 19:13:17 GMT 2000:

Let me "marinate" them for you.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Mon Nov 20 22:12:08 GMT 2000:

>I have breasts.
>

As I once memorably said to Suiii, qualify this statement.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Mon Nov 20 22:17:04 GMT 2000:

She has, yes. Not as magnificent as mine (natch) but they do exist!

( . )( . )


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Mon Nov 20 22:21:04 GMT 2000:

Methinks Subbes should set up an equivalent facelink, then...


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Mon Nov 20 22:21:33 GMT 2000:

Anyway Suiii, you never showed us your face...


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Mon Nov 20 22:28:42 GMT 2000:

You wouldn't want to see it, it's utterly repellent and would detract from my *ahem* mystique!


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Tue Nov 21 01:08:54 GMT 2000:

Suiii's got fabulous breasts and a very nice face, too.

As far as mine, they're pretty obvious at http://www.subbes.nu/one_on_deck.jpg ...so there.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Tue Nov 21 09:12:23 GMT 2000:

Nice trainers, Subbes. And nice pants.



















Oh alright, and nice breasts too.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jo_ham on Tue Nov 21 16:07:56 GMT 2000:

picture taken by jo_ham himself, sometime in august.

edited to remove all the snow and ice and paint in a nice hot summer background*

*lies


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Tue Nov 21 21:35:29 GMT 2000:

Yeah, Joe stole my photos this summer.


Heh, I'll tell the trainers you like them.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jo_ham on Wed Nov 22 14:22:03 GMT 2000:

>Yeah, Joe stole my photos this summer.

ah, ah! but who's super fandabidozy APS camera decided not to work...

and who's trusty point and shoot came through :O)

*ahem*


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Thu Nov 23 01:03:38 GMT 2000:

I don't know, who is "trusty point and shoot came through"?


apostrophe fool.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jo_ham on Thu Nov 23 12:56:56 GMT 2000:

there was a sale on at boots.

I meant to do it really.

makes up for all the times people leave out the possesion apostrophe.

the apostrophe general worker's union was getting restless.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Richard' on Thu Nov 23 13:38:42 GMT 2000:

>the apostrophe general worker's union was getting restless.

the apostrophe general workers' union was getting restless.


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jo_ham on Thu Nov 23 16:20:02 GMT 2000:

there's only one member though......


Subject: Re: SOTCAA was shit [ Previous Message ]
Posted By 'Richard' on Thu Nov 23 18:21:54 GMT 2000:

>there's only one member though......

Okay, you've got me there!!


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]