A-ha! As the 2 forum philosophers, I'm sure we can knock something up between us, Simon...

How do we feel about empirical reality? Shall we have it as a transcendental synthesis of apperception? I like them.

No sense data, however.

Excuse me. There are more than two philosophers on this forum.

What is mind? No matter.
What is matter? Never mind.

I'm a philospher too! What's you view of qualia, Jon? Real or not?

I wrote a thesis about them. They are real.

I like Doritos but not the blue flavour, which may once have sat at the right hand of the cheesy ones, but is clearly wrong

>I like Doritos but not the blue flavour, which may once have sat at the right hand of the cheesy ones, but is clearly wrong

But what is wrong?
Are the mind and the brain different?
Are all objects simply metaphysical?
How bored am I?

The holy book should be a maths text book. Come on forum mathematicians, we will rise up against these philosophy-arts-non-purists.

There's a vending machine in Paradise Street Bus Station in Liverpool that doesn't work. so don't put any money in it.

Qualia are merely patterns! Duh!!

Nice to have the philosophy forum back! Let's ditch all this crappy comedy debate bollocks!

Oi, Bertrand, you prefer maths though, don't you? Logic, that was you, wasn't it.
See, maths rules everywhere.

i have nothing to add as i'm dead

>i have nothing to add as i'm dead

I don't know why, but that comment doesn't quite add up.

Or just the only ones who use our real names , not including philosophers from anywhere outside England or who have never appeared with Lee and Herring ....


< for explanation , find that other thread i'm thinking of >

I think, therefore Boothby is God.

I think, therefore IDEANTSDF

This chair has four legs on it. Irrefutable proof, my belief system is firm and shall never falter.






*kneels down and counts legs*
Oh, shit.