>Apart from the fact he talks utter shite, I have been using my patent pending Comedic Random Application Program (CRAP), to come up with the following Steven parody.
>The fact that it was so easy to do verifies Ewar's point that Steven is Dan L.
>She therefore wins the £5 prize.
>
>Steven: > > > > > I'm really angry I am, you are all wrong, it sucks yankee arse, there hasn't been any good comedy since the cave paintings, and muzak was better it was two cavemen beating sticks on skulls of mammoths, I hate you all, because you are trying to be constructive, and you don't understand that I'm typing this soooo furiously, like a monkey jerking off, grrr, I'm really annoyed now, and it is the whole world's fault, you are all bastards, I will see you all in hell, you pathetic suck-ups, but I have to go now as I've just knackered another keyboard as I type with my fists, you won't hear the end of me that easily though, I have another three hundred words to go and ten minutes before my bedtime, shit, shit, shit, that's what you are, but I'll still watch this show whilst eating my rusks, because I hate it for I lost the remote control which is the fault of everyone in the world, and my dad says that I need the therapy, but can't afford the medication, but one day I'll prove you all wrong, when I am a dustman being jailed for assult, but you'll all get the blame, I have a magic potion to curse you all, this never makes sense as an argument but I don't care because you are all pricks, and I can't go outside to play as it is wet and I don't have any condoms to keep my head dry with, ....etc; etc; (at this point my PC decided to stop as it had enough of the Steven twatting which was wrecking the processor).
>
>You have been rumbled Steven.
>
>Now kindly fuck off.
>
Nice try, but you used puntuation.
I'm not Dan L you idiot, you're obviously sad for doing this idiotic parody, my arguments were concerning the apparent sudden drop in my view of the writing of Herring from his past shows to Time Gentlemen Please, and this being a comedy site, is a perfectly reasonable topic. Granted, I structured my argument completely erroneously, and everytime I stopped my arguing, I would watch another new episode and have my hopes dropped again and would sometimes return to my argument. But this little excercise you have bothered with is pointless, other than trying to make yourself look clever. I am not angry typing arguments, if I was I WOULD BE ALL IN BLOCK CAPITALS LIKE THIS SIMILAR TO EVIL GAS BOTTLE, AND HAVE LOTS OF EXPLANATION MARKS!!!!!!!! I'm not angry at all, just in the terms that there is no point arguing over a series that for the most part is already written, there's no real way it's suddenly going to change. And in the same way my argument was futile, yours is infinitely more so, someone should be parodying you, parodying a bad parodist, then maybe you could parody them, you stupid arse George.
Oh and here's is my amazing parody of Nev Fountain, which really takes skill to do:
In news recently The Queen Mother celebrated her 100th birthday , so if you were to join her at her Birthday Party, you would require basic etiquette, so simply follow our simple Do's and Don't`s.
DO: engage in polite conversation with the Queen Mother, perhaps talking about the current economy.
DON'T: chop her head off and fuck the corpse.
DO: tell her what a wonderful thing the Royal Family is, and you think we should do everything we can to preserve it.
DON'T: tell her it went shite after the second series, and Ricky Tomlinson is a twat.
DO: eat your food with the according cutlary, a soup spoon for the soup, a dessert spoon for the dessert.
DON'T: stab her in the face with a fork and force feed her fishbones until she chokes.
DO: tell her you have set up a wonderful web page about the Queen.
DON'T: tell her you have set up a wonder web page about queens.
DO: tell her how wonderful she looks for her age.
DON'T: try copping a feel before fisting her.
(If audience still do not laugh at this point, get researcher to get audience tape of The Tommy Cooper 1976 Christmas Special and dub over the laughter to the show appropriately, amplify)
> And in the same way my argument was futile, yours is infinitely more so, someone should be parodying you, parodying a bad parodist, then maybe you could parody them, you stupid arse George.
This made me laugh so hard I almost choked on my own lungs. Steven, you are deeply ridiculous, please don't go.
I'm off to add "arsegeorge" to the new swearwords thread. And to spend my fiver.
"EXPLANATION MARKS!!!!!!!!"
Surely Steven rising to the bait of the original posting and replying proves again that he is Dan L?
Anyone, what was wrong with Dan? I always had fun 'talking' to him.
>"EXPLANATION MARKS!!!!!!!!"
Explanation = exclamation in Steven's dictionary .
The thing about Dan L was that I didn't know anything about him until he started whinging about The Corpses having a go at him, and it all got so pitiful and then I found him irritating and I started adding comments and soon I just couldn't stand the kid.
And I thought that 'Guset' thing was hopeless when I looked at it, but he always claimed there was only part of a huge team that did it. Sound familiar, eh?
Steven, I laughed harder at
"DO: tell her how wonderful she looks for her age.
DON'T: try copping a feel before fisting her."
than I feel I ought to.
>I'm not Dan L you idiot, you're obviously sad for doing this idiotic parody, my arguments were concerning the apparent sudden drop in my view of the writing of Herring from his past shows to Time Gentlemen Please, and this being a comedy site, is a perfectly reasonable topic. Granted, I structured my argument completely erroneously, and everytime I stopped my arguing, I would watch another new episode and have my hopes dropped again and would sometimes return to my argument. But this little excercise you have bothered with is pointless, other than trying to make yourself look clever. I am not angry typing arguments, if I was I WOULD BE ALL IN BLOCK CAPITALS LIKE THIS SIMILAR TO EVIL GAS BOTTLE, AND HAVE LOTS OF EXPLANATION MARKS!!!!!!!! I'm not angry at all, just in the terms that there is no point arguing over a series that for the most part is already written, there's no real way it's suddenly going to change. And in the same way my argument was futile, yours is infinitely more so, someone should be parodying you, parodying a bad parodist, then maybe you could parody them, you stupid arse George.
OK, enough... Steven, could you email me please?
[email protected]
Are you all nuts? I think Steven is great. I love his stream of consiousness writing style, he just lets it flow out and doesn't fear exposing himself. He unleashes his thoughts uneditted which I adore. And you may mock but the guy's got deep insight if you just allow yourself to tap into it - explantaion marks for example would be a wonderful addition to the English language. No wonder you're all apprehensive, many of you would then have more than just quote marks around your names to worry about, some of you arse Georges are just inexplicable.
Steven's definitely got something special.
I love the way you go against the grain, Kinder.
Very admirable.
He is still a bit like Dan L, though...
>I love the way you go against the grain, Kinder.
>
>Very admirable.
I thought someone was spying on me when I was assembling my chest...
I should have been a lot more cautious about giving away my address. Though on a constructive note, you didn't happen to see any sign of parts being left out did you?
Hehe, Ok, so I wrote explanation marks by mistake, I wrote the message early in the morning 'cos I was in a rush to catch a bus.
I'm not Dan L, I can barely even remember his postings anyway, I knew my arguments aren't precisely amazingly constructed, but I wasn't trying to do that, it was just an improvised load of stuff I wrote down that bugged me about certain things. So it didn't look too constructive on second reading, so what. I mean I don't think I get too serious about anything, this board is just casual talk about comedy, I don't think there is any reason for people to get incredibly serious. And I said 'George' at the end because I'm sure he wrote the original parody, I have quite good reasons for suspecting this, but I will leave it at that, incase I am wrong, like people were wrong saying I was Dan L. Good day!
>Hehe, Ok, so I wrote explanation marks by mistake, I wrote the message early in the morning 'cos I was in a rush to catch a bus.
Hey babe, no need to justify your subversive actions to me.
>I'm not Dan L, I can barely even remember his postings anyway, I knew my arguments aren't precisely amazingly constructed, but I wasn't trying to do that, it was just an improvised load of stuff I wrote down that bugged me about certain things.
Let it flow Steven. Something worthwhile is bound to emerge.
>So it didn't look too constructive on second reading, so what. I mean I don't think I get too serious about anything, this board is just casual talk about comedy, I don't think there is any reason for people to get incredibly serious.
You're a pioneer of 'casual talk' Steven. Don't pay attention to those too uptight to surf your devil-may-care waves of love.
>And I said 'George' at the end because I'm sure he wrote the original parody, I have quite good reasons for suspecting this, but I will leave it at that, incase I am wrong, like people were wrong saying I was Dan L.
I told you no need to justify Steven. I'm already aware you possess other-worldliness. If 'George' knew what was good for him he'd be wise to keep that name.
Well sycophantic partronisation isn't much better is it?
Patronisation! I resent that Steven. I was only showing my support of your 'casual talk' which I happen to find alluring.
Kinder Surprise - Contrariness is the new rock n' roll.
Been a bit rough with the flu today, but this thread has really cheered me up. (Laughing my arsegeorge off in fact). Shame it has taken a little provocation to get you to justify your style and reasoning Steven, but it all makes sense now. ;)
Furthermore, I don't think that anyone here is deliberatly trying to be clever or smart - Just a little careful and constructive - but you have unintentionally got some backs up, and some of what you post looks messy. A little more thought and less rant, please.
;) george
Actually, on second thoughts, email me:
[email protected]
Can I be arsenik?
Lies! I'm really Dan L!
whoops
Nice one, Nik!
>Nice one, Nik!
Oh dear, whenever I hear that I find myself looking around nervously, fearing that I've spilled beer on someone's trousers/cigarettes/mobile phone/winning lottery ticket/treasure map.
Ewar, what is your arse like then?
Well, I still think it was George, but if it wasn't, at least he can take a joke. But I mean, whoever posted the original thread is obviously an arse, after all that on going argument had settled down, they had to just go and stir it up again with this.
>they had to just go and stir it up again with this.
You forgot to add *holds up large wooden spoon*.
>Ewar, what is your arse like then?
Overweight, underachieving, currently back living with his mother.
God, I enjoyed that.
>Well, I still think it was George, but if it wasn't, at least he can take a joke. But I mean, whoever posted the original thread is obviously an arse, after all that on going argument had settled down, they had to just go and stir it up again with this.
Anonymarse?
(Sorry)
Anonymarse??
Ewar, was that you on the Mark Lamarr thread?
I have already strenuously denied this. Admittedly, I'm not fond of Lamarr (to put it mildly) but I AM FOND OF YOU, AILIE. BUGGER, ACCIDENTALLY HIT CAPSLOCK AGAIN. dON'T BE SCARED.
I am fonder of Ailie.
Ewar, he was no good for you. You should look for someone who appreciates you, and likes the same sort of music, for example.
Jon appears to have to much spare time though. Almost as if... he doesn't really have a job...which of course there is nothing wronfg with... just to clear that up...
>Kinder Surprise - Contrariness is the new rock n' roll.
I disagree.
>>Kinder Surprise - Contrariness is the new rock n' roll.
>
>I disagree.
Touche.
"who's more fond of Ailie?"
This could be a whole thread...
I was only joking, Ewar! :0)
You know it's me...
You know it's me...