I'm trying to stop people speculating ks...

But surely the man I mentioned can't be deemed as a serious speculation?

Can he?

Are there any other no-go areas with this law you are abiding by Rob? Such as any textual evidence of humanity or joy?

I think someone's trying to sue the corpses' arses for every godamn penny they've got.
But, how do you sue the arse of a corpse? Is this not in itself illegal? - i'm confident i've spotted the loophole to get the corpses off the hook. They are dead, aren't they?

This is a dreadful affair. I've thought of a plan to get some answers though. All we need are a few trucks and a partiality for standing still whilst drooling...

>But surely the man I mentioned can't be deemed as a serious speculation?

Even if some speculates as a joke, you can guarentee that someone else will take it seriously and think it's ok for them to post their theories....

Rob I think you are overestimating the average SOTCAA forum poster. We're not smart enough to draw such conclusions Rob. You can rest easy.





Is subbes responsible? I've always had my suspicions about her...

Bad boy / girl.

>Bad boy / girl.

Is that on your CV?

I want some chocolate, a toy...

God's sake, Kinder. i hadn't been in the forum for over a week, yet you just had to mention me.

Admit it, you want me. Yes you do.

is that an open invitation...

Some of us have well-founded theories based on what we have heard from various contacts, but also have enough respect for Rob, Mike and Joe's wishes and position to keep them to ourselves.

That's nice for you.

I will admit that I am worried that I could end up watching/buying/whatever something that involves whoever was responsible and thus inadvertently supporting someone who I would wish to offer no support for whatsoever, which does play on my radical conscience a bit... but if The Corpses don't want us to know, they don't want us to know and that's that as far as I'm concerned.