"The Newest, Hottest British Music Sensation" Posted Sat Sep 9 02:46:32 BST 2000 by subbes

Who are BBMak, or whatever they're called? I've never heard of them, they look like a poor Savage Garden trading on the "look! We play instruments!" gimmick.

Um. Does anyone know who they are, or are they just another stupid band?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Sat Sep 9 10:08:22 BST 2000:

I don't know them, but my money's on them being just another stupid band.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TVOD on Sat Sep 9 11:48:24 BST 2000:

They're from Wigan.
They eat pies.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Sat Sep 9 12:27:16 BST 2000:

Surely the "newest, Hottest etc" is fantastic MOR band Toploader? I must rush out and buy the terrable named debut album "Onka's Big Moka" (or whatever the fuck it's called) so i can listen to the mediocre songs which are a cross between Reef and Dodgy. Oh and the Beatles, obviously. Who with me?

This other band, i've never heard of.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By subbes on Sat Sep 9 13:36:05 BST 2000:

Toploader?

The only good thing about toploader is that one of them has a huuuuge afro.

Even Coldplay and that slightly-banana-hued-song are better.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bent Halo on Sat Sep 9 15:23:01 BST 2000:

I saw Terris at Reading, who I was initially aware of from a "hottest pale indie twatgobblers"-type cover feature in NME. They sounded like any other bunch of pale indie twatgobblers.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Sat Sep 9 17:18:17 BST 2000:

The only hot new musical acts are Clinic and Ladytron. And maybe Vada, but I'm biased by knowing them.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jus "Gambo" Tin on Sat Sep 9 17:31:35 BST 2000:

>Surely the "newest, Hottest etc" is fantastic MOR band Toploader?
>
They are even worse than Ocean Colour Scene, but "Dancing In The Moonlight" (a cover of a 1972 American hit for R&B group King Harvest) is a very nice song.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Evil Bill on Sun Sep 10 00:26:00 BST 2000:

You are right about Clinic. The sooner they shake off this confusingly dubbed "new Wedding Present" monicker the better.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Mon Sep 11 09:55:07 BST 2000:

The best new acts are Fosca, Cody, Baxendale and Brassy.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Mon Sep 11 21:43:24 BST 2000:

Anyone remember when 'Kenickie' were supposed to be the next big thing? Well I had inside knowledge, and knew they were destined to die on their arses and spend all eternity drinking White Lightning in a kids playground.*
















*Note:This is an actual fact, I have witnessed it with my own eyeses.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By paul twist on Tue Sep 12 00:55:10 BST 2000:

Can't stand Brassy.
Kenickie's first few singles were great.
Listen to the Get Up Kids - they're American but they are truly excellent. Like college rock, but better.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Tue Sep 12 09:51:00 BST 2000:

I agree - Kenickie had their moments of being genuinely exciting.

Especially in the context of all the other dreary sludge that was around at the time.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Tue Sep 12 10:32:03 BST 2000:

Suii, they've split up now, you can't still be sulking that they wouldn't have you in the band.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 14:12:57 BST 2000:

Ugh please! They are the sort of people that I tend to loathe on sight. Mocking a disabled boy who was put in one of our A-level classes is not big, nor is it clever.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 14:17:54 BST 2000:

Oh yeah, and the sight of so-called 'Marie Du Santiago' (Mary Johnson or something) walking around St*pl*s in a Kenickie t-shirt, while getting her sister to say "What's it like being in a famous band?" desperately trying to get recognised is a sight that will stay with me forever! That, and having her trying to haggle down the price of a 30 quid printer 'cos she was 'a poor student'. Mwaaaaaaahahahahahhah.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Tue Sep 12 14:24:22 BST 2000:

So you were in the band, then?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 14:27:49 BST 2000:

Nope. Only musical instruments I can play are the violin, the oboe and the piano. Not really conducive to chart success!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ted Cunterblast on Tue Sep 12 14:34:03 BST 2000:

>The best new acts are Fosca, Cody, Baxendale and Brassy.

Ooh, blimey, I don't think so. The first and third contain some charming people making charmless music. The fourth have been around for ever. The second aren't even liked by their label boss.

I'll shut up now before I get myself into trouble.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Tue Sep 12 15:19:19 BST 2000:

Bet you're a fan of Radiohead and all that shit.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ted Cunterblast on Tue Sep 12 16:12:41 BST 2000:

>Bet you're a fan of Radiohead and all that shit.

Flat out wrong.

I'm a fictional character from a Fry & Laurie sketch and, as such, I'm not allowed to divulge my musical preferences lest I reveal my true identity.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Tue Sep 12 16:18:49 BST 2000:

It's not you, is it, Bent?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Tue Sep 12 16:38:13 BST 2000:

>Nope. Only musical instruments I can play are the violin, the oboe and the piano. Not really conducive to chart success!

I hear Belle & Sebastian are looking to get back to an octet... you should fit in nicely.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Tue Sep 12 18:15:09 BST 2000:

>>Nope. Only musical instruments I can play are the violin, the oboe and the piano. Not really conducive to chart success!
>
Right, you can join my virtual band then - who else wants to?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 18:57:12 BST 2000:

Belle and Sebastian didn't make music, they just needed to travel around a bit, pretending to be muso's, to spend some of Daddy's money and gained a following of sad little wannabe indie-kids.

PJ-What's the virtual band gonna be called then?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Joe on Tue Sep 12 19:06:00 BST 2000:

http://www.buro9.com/forum/forumdisplay.php3?forumid=8


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Tue Sep 12 19:57:56 BST 2000:

Is it just my computer that takes fucking ages to load this page or what? What's it all about then, Joe?

As for names - i don't know - but it has to be memorable.
And you didn't even have to ask what i played.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 20:22:41 BST 2000:

How selfish of me! PJ, what do you play?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Justin on Tue Sep 12 23:02:41 BST 2000:

>>>Nope. Only musical instruments I can play are the violin, the oboe and the piano. Not really conducive to chart success!
>>
>Right, you can join my virtual band then - who else wants to?

I used to play flute and alto sax - how un-rock'n'roll is that? And no, I don't like Jethro Tull.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 23:08:52 BST 2000:

You joining our band too then Justin?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Justin on Tue Sep 12 23:11:35 BST 2000:

>You joining our band too then Justin?

Not a question I've been asked very often! It's been a while since I played, but hey! maybe that's more 'rock'n'roll'.

If you want me in, that is.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Tue Sep 12 23:54:06 BST 2000:

Eccellente!!
Right, so that's you, me and PJ, John will join if I make him, he can be our 'Bez'!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Wed Sep 13 00:24:22 BST 2000:

I'm a solo artist. So there!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Wed Sep 13 01:03:24 BST 2000:

>How selfish of me! PJ, what do you play?

Why, the guitar - but if that's not rock and roll enough, i'll just get the old Euphonium out...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Wed Sep 13 12:59:13 BST 2000:

Haven't you got an accordion then? *disappointed*


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 13:03:07 BST 2000:

OK, so it's Suii on oboe, Justin on flute, PJ on euphonium, and me on spoons / heartbreaking lyrics. How can we fail?

I bet kinder surprise will be our first groupie...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Wed Sep 13 13:28:31 BST 2000:

>Belle and Sebastian didn't make music, they just needed to travel around a bit, pretending to be muso's, to spend some of Daddy's money and gained a following of sad little wannabe indie-kids.

Ah, that must be what I am then.

What absolute drivel.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 13:30:40 BST 2000:

Mike's the singer.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Wed Sep 13 13:47:18 BST 2000:

OK, he can write our lyrics too.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 13:53:40 BST 2000:

No, I'm doing the lyrics. Here's my first, B&S-tinged effort, entitled "The Flower Whose Petals Fell Off":

The boy didn't like going to school,
The other kids would throw him in the swimming pool,
So he'd dream of flowers and pixies,
So he'd dream of flowers and pixies,
Flowers in the rain,
And then all the petals would fall off.


Is that insipid enough?

Don't worry Mike, I love them really.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suiii on Wed Sep 13 14:00:41 BST 2000:

*laughing* that's truly inspired Jon!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 14:10:12 BST 2000:

"Judy and the Great Glass Elevator"
Judy loves the band, she's tyhe biggest clapper,
All the local boys say she's just a slapper,
But she don't care, she got a secret stash in the living room,
And her mum never heard the phrase 'magic mushroom'

Oh Judy, riding through the sky,
Watching Glasgow life drift by,
You're a dreamer kid,
You're a dreamer kid.
Etc...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Wed Sep 13 14:14:02 BST 2000:

>No, I'm doing the lyrics. Here's my first, B&S-tinged effort, entitled "The Flower Whose Petals Fell Off":

Not bad, actually. You neglected to imply a lisp for added effect. Isn't there a Babelfish-style translator on the web somewhere, which automates this kind of thing?

>And then all the petals would fall off.

[The last three words here are delivered without accompaniment, five-second pause, then the trumpet'n'glockenspiel middle-eight cuts in. Rockin']

>Don't worry Mike, I love them really.

I don't doubt it. That's the thing about being a fan - you can take the piss out of your favourites mercilessly. But if someone *else* does it...

There's an argument to say they peaked with track 8 of their debut album, though... ;)


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 14:20:52 BST 2000:

"My Wandering Days Are Over" - yes, one of my faves. I don't listen to the new album much. But "Arab Strap" was one of the best albums of the 90s. I will not tolerate disagreement on theat issue.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Wed Sep 13 14:30:27 BST 2000:

>"My Wandering Days Are Over" - yes, one of my faves. I don't listen to the new album much. But "Arab Strap" was one of the best albums of the 90s. I will not tolerate disagreement on theat issue.

And you won't get any from me. Consensus amongst the, er, mailing-list cognoscenti seems to rate "Strap" at the bottom of the pile, but I'm having none of that. They hit the right balance between stripped-down ("Sinister") and overly-ornate ("Peasant) in their sound on that record. There's also a shedload of personal reasons why late summer '98 was a great time to be a B&S fan, but I'll not go there...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Wed Sep 13 15:09:51 BST 2000:

Right, here's ya choon for the words then:

V: E/B/A/D (x4)

CH: A/D/E/D (x4)


Will that do?

I can also supply exciting harmonica/Penny whistle parts.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Wed Sep 13 15:17:27 BST 2000:

No, we need someone on mandolin.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Wed Sep 13 15:19:09 BST 2000:

Oh, that doesn't sound to hard to play...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Wed Sep 13 15:59:30 BST 2000:

>No, we need someone on mandolin.

Can I do the live Eno-style 'treatments and manipulations'?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Sep 14 13:01:30 BST 2000:

Er, what would you be manipulating, for sonic effect?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Mike J on Thu Sep 14 13:29:21 BST 2000:

>Er, what would you be manipulating, for sonic effect?

The lot of you, all at once. You wouldn't know whether you were coming or going.

The on-stage monitors would get one feed, the PA another, and me another still. It'd be like LSD *on acid*.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Sep 14 13:41:24 BST 2000:

No, it'd be like Gaye Bykers On Acid *on acid*.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Thu Sep 14 13:47:35 BST 2000:

So.. anyone got a name for this group then? It needs to be 'memorable'


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Sep 14 13:51:34 BST 2000:

"Ewar Woowar's Wooing Ewes".


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Sep 14 13:52:22 BST 2000:

But is that a possessive apostrophe, or....


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Sep 14 13:55:59 BST 2000:

"The kinder surprise Surprise"

"The Simon Harries Five"

"Bent Halo's Fire"

"Jon, Suiii, Justin, PJ, Mike, Dozy, Lee & Titch"


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By paul twist on Thu Sep 14 15:05:25 BST 2000:

No, it'd be like Rich Kids on LSD - on acid!

This would've made more sense had it been posted a few messages up. Sorry.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ailie on Thu Sep 14 17:41:13 BST 2000:

See if I hear another thing about Jeepster...

Joe, since you left that link, I wondered whether you might ever have had the pleasure of meeting little Miss. Jeepster (Idleberry) herself?

Just wondering...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 01:31:18 BST 2000:

We need someone on mandolin???

This isn't bloody REM you know!

And don't deprive them, because they've only got five mandolin players as it is.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 09:32:45 BST 2000:

Watch it TJ, or we could relegate you to triangle duties.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 10:21:46 BST 2000:

I told you, I'm a solo artist.

I'm too cutting edge and avant garde.
Simply not commercial enough.

Watch out for me on the next series of "Blue Jam"...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 10:29:39 BST 2000:

Yeah, you'll be in the credits as "Triangle player".


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 10:30:54 BST 2000:

No, you'll be in a sketch featuring Kevin Eldon as a man obsessed with throwing triangle players in cesspools.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 10:31:51 BST 2000:

Face it kid, you can dream your dreams, but there's only one place where you can play your triangle with dignity: in our band.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Sam D on Fri Sep 15 10:36:32 BST 2000:

Can I be the legendary "fifth" er... can't be bothered trawling back through thread to find out what name you settled on.
Or perhaps, just perhaps..
[At this point Sam stares dreamily into the distance, a broad smiling spreading across his face, as he dreams of stardom]


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 10:41:07 BST 2000:

I'll start you off as our roadie, until I can find a role for you that offers less self-respect.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Sam D on Fri Sep 15 10:44:30 BST 2000:

If its lack of self-respect you're thinking, perhaps I could be the MANAGER!
Hey hey!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 10:48:40 BST 2000:

OK, when's our first Peel Session then, Mr Manager?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Supra Gnat on Fri Sep 15 10:54:50 BST 2000:

If you are prepared to actually do this I can get you some studio time in central London if you wish, although I dread to think what would result.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Sam D on Fri Sep 15 10:55:43 BST 2000:

Sorry, I'm too busy snorting cocaine from a high-class brasser's gusset to sort out any Peel sessions for you bunch of no-talent chancers.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 11:01:36 BST 2000:

"If you are prepared to actually do this I can get you some studio time in central London if you wish, although I dread to think what would result."

Probably the next B&S album.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 11:08:25 BST 2000:

Triangle?

Listen sunshine, I'll have you know that I am an accomplished player of the guitar and the piano, and have played in proper bands and everything!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 11:15:41 BST 2000:

What, both together? Blimey, I'd like to see that...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By a famous mystery songwriter on Fri Sep 15 11:26:58 BST 2000:


i have written you a song

it goes now then now then now then how's about that then how's about that then guys and gals guys and gals oowahhuhahuhahuhuh


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 11:27:31 BST 2000:

No, not both at once. I'm not Nigel Tufnel.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 11:28:27 BST 2000:

[gasps] You're not... the bloke out of Smokie, are you?

We are not worthy!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 11:32:37 BST 2000:

No, I'm the bloke out of Feedback Report. You'll never have heard us.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 11:41:13 BST 2000:

Chris Dunkley?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 11:45:04 BST 2000:

No, Feedback Report.

Not Feedback.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 12:08:03 BST 2000:

He started up the band after he was sacked from the show.

They do songs attacking The Archers scriptwriters.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 12:19:27 BST 2000:

We'll never reach worldwide stardom is you keep being ditracted by TJ resume.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 12:23:51 BST 2000:

I have no resume. I'm not American


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 12:29:55 BST 2000:

Go on. Be American. Just this once.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 12:47:08 BST 2000:

OK...

(puts on propellor hat and eats twinkie at the mall) Hey y'all, remove that script from the site already.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 16:36:00 BST 2000:

Jeez!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 16:48:05 BST 2000:

Laydeez... may I introduce the quick-chatting rap double act PJ & TJ, The J-Boys!


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 16:55:30 BST 2000:

Ah yes, but we don't have a catchphrase, unlike Jon - who, in all probability, could be a third 'J-boy' (sounds like a suspect name to me). So, altogether then:
Fancy a shandy?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 17:00:21 BST 2000:

"P to the J to the T to the J to the J to Boy LET'S ROCK THE HOUSE!!!"

That what you had in mind?


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 17:01:46 BST 2000:

If Richard Blackwood can have a career in music, any fucker can do it.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 17:19:09 BST 2000:

That's music is it? I thought it was just 'vanity with beats'
Music eh? don't you think i've tried? I got a song on the internet. Somewhere...


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Fri Sep 15 17:27:20 BST 2000:

I've got a song in my heart. But it's just for Ewar Woowar.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By TJ on Fri Sep 15 17:38:01 BST 2000:

I have several catchphrases, notably

"It was better on the radio"
"I love Ailie"

and

"The new issue will be ready on monday/tuesday/wednesday/thursday/friday/saturday/sunday/the start of next week"


Subject: Re: Whats your catchphrase? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Sam D on Fri Sep 15 17:49:23 BST 2000:

I'd quite like a catchphrase.


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 19:06:37 BST 2000:

Well then, watch the show catchphrase - that's bound to be full of them, isn't it?

(Note: Catchphrase has not used a real ctachphrase since 1993. And that was an accident. The above statement is obviously a joke)

"It was better on the radio"

Isn't that just a sit catchphrase - not limited to one person

"I love Ailie"

That more of a craving than a catchphrase

"The new issue will be ready on monday/tuesday/wednesday/thursday/friday/saturday/sunday/the start of next week"

Yeah, you can ahve that one - it's catchy in its own way (and also a phrase, so that works)

I, on the other hand, feel a catchphrase would be too limiting on my comedy persona, and would attract to much 'pleb appeal', thus rendering my subtle and sophisticated act a mess, reliant on repition of said non-existent catchphrase. Susbequently, i decide to decline any notions.



Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Sep 15 19:08:08 BST 2000:

Should read:
"It was better on the radio"

Isn't that just a site catchphrase - not limited to one person?

And other mistakes to be changed as well


Subject: Re: [ Previous Message ]
Posted By paul twist on Fri Sep 15 22:57:52 BST 2000:

"I decide to decline any notions" would make a good catchphrase, though.


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]