with more spelling errors too
WhatÕs wrong with this picture?
> Jim Youkum's The (Non-Inflatable) Monty Python TV Companion (Dowling Press
> 1999) requotes a few old biogs in a short section given over to Adams/Python
> crossovers. He mentions that the never-filmed second show included an Adams
> sketch about a haddock being accepted at Eton and that Chapman's adopted son
> John Tomiczek claimed that Adams nicked it from rejected Python material.
Chapman and Adams were writing Out of the Trees together, right? Chapman was a member of Python, right? What does ÔAdams nicked it from rejected Python materialÕ mean? DoesnÕt make sense if you think about it. Has anyone asked Yoakum what it means? Has anyone asked Adams about it?
>WhatÕs wrong with this picture?
>
>> Jim Youkum's The (Non-Inflatable) Monty Python TV Companion (Dowling Press
>> 1999) requotes a few old biogs in a short section given over to Adams/Python
>> crossovers. He mentions that the never-filmed second show included an Adams
>> sketch about a haddock being accepted at Eton and that Chapman's adopted son
>> John Tomiczek claimed that Adams nicked it from rejected Python material.
>
>Chapman and Adams were writing Out of the Trees together, right? Chapman was a member of Python, right? What does ÔAdams nicked it from rejected Python materialÕ mean? DoesnÕt make sense if you think about it. Has anyone asked Yoakum what it means? Has anyone asked Adams about it?
>
It means what it says. You got a problem with that? Ask the late J Tomiczek what he meant. Hey, lemme ask you, what books have you ever written?
It's just that what it says doesn't make sense, is all.