Steve Penk.....why? Posted Wed Jun 28 22:28:01 BST 2000 by NF

Why Steve Penk?


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Lucifer Stevens on Thu Jun 29 00:17:50 BST 2000:

Like it or lump it, Steve Penk, if you think about it, *IS* ITV: Bum-faced, local-radio-voiced and "light" in the worst possible sense of the word. I particularly detest that format of programme - the rib-tickling clips show... from You've Been Framed to - well, where is there to go? Auntie's Bloomers... Before They Were Famous ("And now the moment just five seconds before Anthea Turner was officially classified famous! There she is! Look at her <inaudible smirk>... face! And her <titter>... hair! I bet she really didn't want that one shown, eh viewers?")...

Sadly I have to file it away under "not even worth getting worked up about, for Christ's sakes". You can go mad worrying otherwise.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Jun 29 07:00:00 BST 2000:

I heard him on the radio while I was having my hair cut once. He was rubbish.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Justin on Thu Jun 29 08:47:09 BST 2000:

>I heard him on the radio while I was having my hair cut once. He was rubbish.

He might be on Capital, but that's still local radio. He's a bit like Adrian Juste in that "here's something funny I'm going to show you but I'll interrupt it with my deathly scripted quips otherwise there's no point having me in, really" sort of way. Which really does sum him up, really.

He makes prank phone calls, you know. OH, my sides.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Jun 29 11:29:39 BST 2000:

Prank phone calls? What, like you mean he rings up the police tells them he's planted a bomb somewhere, but really he hasn't? That sort of thing?


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bods on Thu Jun 29 12:10:43 BST 2000:

>Why Steve Penk?

On the Radio:
Steve Penk is the epitemy of commercial radio.

On the TV:
Steve Penk is the epitemy of commercial television.

HTH.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By johnny banana on Thu Jun 29 12:39:35 BST 2000:

come on there could be worse

i know Martin Collins & at least Penk does play quite good music


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Colonel Danby on Thu Jun 29 13:00:09 BST 2000:

I'm getting fed up with the standard of spelling on this forum.
Bods: It's epitome not whatever you wrote.
And please, everyone, learn how to spell definite.
I shall be watching closely in future.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu Jun 29 13:43:21 BST 2000:

Well, you can't even spell 'Colin' properly.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Thu Jun 29 17:11:23 BST 2000:

What's the point in moaning about peoples spelling - do you honestly think i'm going to read through the shit messages that i send? I don't think so.

Penk is shit of course - hence working for ITV


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Duncun on Thu Jun 29 17:26:41 BST 2000:

>What's the point in moaning about peoples spelling - do you honestly think i'm going to read through the shit messages that i send? I don't think so.
>
I think you should start, then at least someone will have read through them.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Thu Jun 29 17:31:33 BST 2000:

>>What's the point in moaning about peoples spelling - do you honestly think i'm going to read through the shit messages that i send? I don't think so.
>>
>I think you should start, then at least someone will have read through them.

I leave it to you to read them if that's ok.

You Cock


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jase on Thu Jun 29 18:44:45 BST 2000:

Now then ladies lets not turn nasty :)

Who cares about spelling anyway? I always take care to spell correctly but does it really matter if someone else doesn't, as long as they get their point across?


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Duncun on Thu Jun 29 19:54:05 BST 2000:

>You Cock

I am intrigued to know why you think this is offensive. Not that I'll read through the whole answer.



Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Thu Jun 29 21:09:13 BST 2000:

>>You Cock
>
>I am intrigued to know why you think this is offensive. Not that I'll read through the whole answer.
>

It's a sarcastic insult.

You Cock


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By I say on Thu Jun 29 21:53:42 BST 2000:

The bizzare thing about Steve Penk is, that he's the spitting image of Graham Fellows when not in his John Shuttleworth garb.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Joe on Thu Jun 29 22:05:20 BST 2000:

Fight,fight,fight...


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Al on Fri Jun 30 08:07:14 BST 2000:

The title of this thread could potentially be the name of a track on the next Half Man Half Biscuit album.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Rickkles on Fri Jun 30 09:12:09 BST 2000:

>What's the point in moaning about peoples spelling - do you honestly think i'm going to read through the shit messages that i send? I don't think so.

I will stand up for the Kernal, sorry, Colonel and say that I prefer correct spelling and grammar, even though I'm not the best at it myself.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bods on Fri Jun 30 11:19:03 BST 2000:


>I will stand up for the Kernal, sorry, Colonel and say that I prefer correct spelling and grammar, even though I'm not the best at it myself.

Well I like it meself but the fact of the matter is that I am a bad typist and a bad speller too. And until someone builds a web browser that spell checks your form submissions, or I actually have the time to check what I write, things aren't going to change much.

I also don't have a dictionary on my desk...


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By MM on Fri Jun 30 13:47:49 BST 2000:


Now you do:

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary.htm


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Anonymous on Fri Jun 30 14:27:08 BST 2000:

How is "You Cock" a *sarcastic* insult, exactly? Do you know what sarcastic means? Are you sarcastically implying that you don't think he is a cock?


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Duncun on Fri Jun 30 16:00:27 BST 2000:

>>>You Cock
>>
>>I am intrigued to know why you think this is offensive. Not that I'll read through the whole answer.
>>
>
>It's a sarcastic insult.
>
>You Cock
>
>

Well at least the spelling was right in your definition even though it had little else going for it.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Jun 30 18:47:27 BST 2000:

So 'Duncan', if thats your real name...why not try concentrating your efforts into writing something worthwhile, rather than thinking up a funny name.

You cunt-fuck.

This is not sarcastic. I think you are good - this is sarcastic. Do you see the difference now?


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Duncun Doughnuts on Fri Jun 30 19:25:09 BST 2000:


>
>You cunt-fuck.
>
>This is not sarcastic. I think you are good - this is sarcastic. Do you see the difference now?

So you don't think a 'cunt-fuck' is good? Perhaps your technique is 'sarcastic'.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Jun 30 22:53:00 BST 2000:

Who said anything about 'a' cunt-fuck?

btw, if this really matters, Joe wrote that last e-mail for me - cheers. i could never think of an insult as good as that.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Anonymous on Sat Jul 1 08:44:26 BST 2000:

>Why Steve Penk?

He is just what Carlton and LWT likes.

i.e. He is cheap.

LWT may make good regional programmes, but come on, most programmes that they make involve a VT machine with a load of 'funny' cock-ups.


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By joe on Sat Jul 1 11:05:52 BST 2000:

No I didn't write that insult. PJ is of course lying to try and cover up. This is not sarcastic, either. Go on, fight damn you.


Subject: Chris Tarrant.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By NF on Sat Jul 1 12:56:57 BST 2000:

Why do ITV insist on foisting another Capital DJ on us....Tarrant On TV the most dated and unimaginative programme gets commision after commission all on the Back of Millionare. I've never found Tarrant on the radio any better that your usual local radio DJ even though Londoners go on and on about him!


Subject: Re: Steve Penk.....why? [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Sat Jul 1 20:52:35 BST 2000:

Old Joke about Tarrent on Tv - (Serious voice) That was a harrowing advert for drink driving, shown in Australia to combat the horrendous oucome of such terrible behaviour.

Now here's a fat woman giving a man a blow job!


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]