Carla Lane Posted Fri Jun 9 17:10:37 BST 2000 by Justin

Is anyone prepared to stick their head above the parapet and admit that they quite like something she's written?

For instance, I quite enjoyed the Liver Birds as a small child (and will no doubt be horrified when I'm compelled to watch an old episode next week on BBC2). Does anyone else wish to make such a cathartic admission?

I hate everything else she ever wrote though. Especially Bread, obviously.


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Paul on Fri Jun 9 17:20:00 BST 2000:

>Is anyone prepared to stick their head above the parapet and admit that they quite like something she's written?
>
>For instance, I quite enjoyed the Liver Birds as a small child (and will no doubt be horrified when I'm compelled to watch an old episode next week on BBC2). Does anyone else wish to make such a cathartic admission?
>
>I hate everything else she ever wrote though. Especially Bread, obviously.

>Sorry Justin, but I just can't bring myself to admit that I've ever liked anything she did - well may be the occasional and I did say "occasional" laugh from the new Liver Birds (wait until you see the old ones - oh dear) Carla Lane actually lives very near me, so perhaps I should pop over and ask her what she's playing at, writing such dross !!!


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Joe on Fri Jun 9 17:43:54 BST 2000:

Did carla lane write butterflies? If so, then yes, I like something she has written. Fantastic vehicle for wendy craig, and great show to pretend to like, to be ironic and appear interesting. Hmmm


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Jun 9 19:23:28 BST 2000:

Joe obvoiusly has a brain problem. I'll have to fix it for him.

I enjoyed the BBC cut versions of Bread - but for an completely different reason obviously.


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Joe on Fri Jun 9 22:11:39 BST 2000:

You speak like you know these people. Anway, it's not me with the 'poorly brain', we all know who that is. (Well, PJ does anyway)


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Fri Jun 9 23:51:07 BST 2000:

Now now, we'll have no more of this poorly brain talk. So what if both my Brocke and Wernicker area's of the frontal lobes are not working to thier full capacity - this is a serious problem, OK?


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Joe on Sat Jun 10 11:55:06 BST 2000:

I was talking about craig - but your technical metalanguage has put me in my place, so i'll stop now.


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Sat Jun 10 12:15:40 BST 2000:

Craig eh? that's all right then. Forget everything i said.


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Justin on Tue Jun 13 20:06:46 BST 2000:

No - just watched The Liver Birds, and it was terrible. And it was made in 1973! Imagine being crap for that long. I was always under the impression that the Polly James era was better than the Elizabeth Estensen one. But on this evidence, it wasn't.

I feel a bit guilty about starting this thread now. What a waste.


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By RobKins (patent pending) on Sun Jun 18 09:08:28 BST 2000:

but if butterflies is half decent, then the antithesis the so called "anti-scouse" must be Luv (spelt like that if i do recall)
the (not so) torrid encouters of a man who's trying to sound like Ringo Starr and also attemting to get off with the lady from a frozen peas advert (Julie Peasgood)
oh and it also had a "hilarious" animal rights protestor slacker son it it
mmm


Subject: Re: Carla Lane [ Previous Message ]
Posted By mk on Tue Jun 20 18:11:26 BST 2000:

I liked bread. at the time.
there i've said it.
was it a bad show? what was wrong with it?


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]