was it comedy review, ca 1996? had a regular column by peter baynham and lots of l&h leanings. also keen on (though fucked around by) morris.
j xxx
'The Heckler' was early nineties - might have been that.
It might be either, but I'm sure it was called 'Gagtime', something like that. It was defunct by about '96, no later.
There was one called DeadPan, one called Comedy Review and then there was Scallywag, which wasn't strictly a comedy mag, (it was more like a snarling, highly libellous bastard son of Private Eye) but it did have The Heckler as a pull-out section in the middle, I think. Incidentally John Major tried to sue Scallywag after it alleged he had an extra-marital affair.
Deadpan (1994-95) came from the 'don't talk to us about comedy, we're too pissed ha ha' perspective and had a really horrid typeface. Comedy Review (1996), despite being edited by Danny Wallace, was very well-written in comparison.
There was also a magazine called Comedy which ran for one issue in 1994. Its cover, featuring a photo of innocent non-rapist Craig Charles about a week before his arrest, may have contributed to its downfall...
Why don't comedy magazine survive, we wonder?
Comedy magazine was given the option of running with Rob Newman as the cover story (they had already penned a piece on him for the cover of issue 2), as CC was arrested just a couple of days before Comedy went to press, but chose instead to run with the more controversial cover.
Issue 2 never made it to the newsstands.
Incidentally, Comedy Review, towards the end of their short tenure, ran a cover with Steve Coogan. Anyone who bought the magazine would have been upset (like I was) to discover that it didn't actually contain an
interview with him.
It was definitely 'Deadpan' that I have the memories of. Thankyou for supplying the name. For confirmation, Rob S will have to check with S.Lee about the material I mentioned. Anyway, what do people remember about 'Deadpan'? Was it any good?
I did read Deadpan, but I have just been looking at some old comedy stuff in a drawer, and I have got the first two cover tapes from Comedy Review.
They have got on them:
Tape 1
1. Sean Hughes - Parents
2. Stephen Fry - The letter
3. Eddie Izzard - Advertising/Are you happy with your wash ?
4. Peter Cook - The end of the world bit
Tape 2
1. Billy Connoly - Drinking
2. Arnold Brown - Pubs and Patisseries
3. Mark Steel - Pub Piano Song
4. Michael Bentine - The bishop of sydney
5. Matt Welcome - What you CAN do ...
6. Larry Miller - The five levels of drinking
How could a mag that was giving away free Mark Steel and Arnold Brown routines have possibly failed? What do readers want - pictures of semi-naked women or something?
I agree completly. I guess that the market for a specialist comedy mag is very small, and most people are not into comedy in a big way and get their info from tv progs and mags like heat.
I would buy any new well written comedy mags that come out, but I dont think another one will come out for a long time.
>I agree completly. I guess that the market for a specialist comedy mag is very small, and most people are not into comedy in a big way and get their info from tv progs and mags like heat.
>
Incredible, though in a way - you'd think that the obsession with niche marketing would make these things successful. How is it that there's no real humour magazine anymore - apart from Viz, which still has its moments, but usually in the news items rather than the strips? (I'm not even counting Private Eye.)
>I would buy any new well written comedy mags that come out, but I dont think another one will come out for a long time.
Think you're right, unfortunately. Could The Corpses oblige - mind you, on second thoughts, they've already offended some of the more occasional visitors to the site, so God knows what would happen to the circulation of a magazine.