Armstrong & Miller
Posted Wed May 17 14:46:53 BST 2000 by Jon
Armstrong & Miller. Yes. Why are they never mentioned around here?
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By DL on Wed May 17 15:16:07 BST 2000:
my mate was in it, in the teacher sketch that was really heavily plugged....
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By DL on Wed May 17 15:16:08 BST 2000:
my mate was in it, in the teacher sketch that was really heavily plugged....
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Suna on Wed May 17 21:59:57 BST 2000:
>Armstrong & Miller. Yes. Why are they never mentioned around here?
>
Because they're not worth mentioning.
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Jon on Thu May 18 10:56:43 BST 2000:
Oh, I think they have a certain charm...
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Beccy on Fri May 19 01:03:41 BST 2000:
I certainly find them preferable to Adam and Joe - though having seen very little of either parties, I can't go into much depth I'm afraid. Call it instinct. However disliked that is for a reason on this forum....
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By a0d on Sun May 21 13:26:54 BST 2000:
I cant even f*cking well remember any of it!!!
load of cack.
Big Train was good though...
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Anonymous on Sun May 21 14:09:59 BST 2000:
well that's that then, isn't it?
Subject: Re: Armstrong
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By a0d on Sun May 21 14:43:49 BST 2000:
everything i say is correct, so yep!
[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]