jam ediiiiit neeeeews
Posted Sun May 14 09:54:57 BST 2000 by Blake Connolly
Do the authors know that the pic from the preview copy at the bottom of the Blue Jam/jam edit news is an edit itself? You don't see below the girl's dress when David Cann lifts it up in both transmitted versions yet you do there, and there appears (but it's quite hard to tell) to be a prosthetic cock underneath it in the screen grab. Just wondering because there's no mention of it in the text and the rest of the site's comprehensive about these things.
Another thing, although I don't know if it's worthy of going in the edit news - last night's 'remixed repeat' was ep 6 when it should have been ep 5. Since all related websites (4 Later, jamcredits.com) bill episode 5 and there was no warning that it'd be the wrong episode, it seems like this was a very late change. Perhaps even a tape mix-up? Don't think it'd be anything sinister anyway.
I'm just desperate to see the pilot to see if Rothcoe's in it. Despite it's length it would surely have been the highlight of the series. Unless of course they did film it, looked back at the tape and thought better of it..
Subject: Re: jam ediiiiit neeeeews
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Christopher John Lyons on Sun May 14 17:16:41 BST 2000:
>Another thing, although I don't know if it's worthy of going in the edit news - last night's 'remixed repeat' was ep 6 when it should have been ep 5.
Buggeration. I wanted to record ep 6 - I missed it first time round. Thanks a million, Channel 4. Eejits.
Subject: Re: jam ediiiiit neeeeews
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Blake Connolly on Sun May 21 08:29:26 BST 2000:
OK, so last night episode 5 was shown. However, it wasn't in any way remixed - it was just the original episode (it even had the normal Channel 4 continuity announcement before it, not 4Later)
Episode 5's quite a weird one in that it seems to be a different kind of "dark", one that happens during the day. Also, the intro is unusual in that none of the regular cast members appear in it.
It also is the episode with "Ted in Primary 3" which appears could be cut (as speculated in edit news)
Whether or not a remix of the episode was made you can't tell. Last week all the relevant websites billed episode 5 when 6 was shown, this week the Channel Four sites have been down but the 4Later one's back up now and it lists episode 5 (as "6/6 previously billed as "5/6") and says it's a remixed repeat.
Subject: Re: jam ediiiiit neeeeews
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By a0d on Sun May 21 13:31:42 BST 2000:
no no no, they mixed it up for a reason, but you obvously dont get the karma maaan....
I missed episond 5 of Jam, and episode 6 (showin in place of 5) in Jaaaaaaam!!
And i had a previouse vision about it all being the 5's!! How whacked is that???
Subject: Re: jam ediiiiit neeeeews
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By Blake Connolly on Sun May 21 16:04:20 BST 2000:
Ah, well now you put it like that, it's clearly all your fault and you should be punished with a ten pound fine.
Subject: Re: jam ediiiiit neeeeews
[ Previous Message ]
Posted By a0d on Sun May 21 19:07:42 BST 2000:
Frigs, and its the last 10 pounds i have to my name aswell!!!
[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]