Keith Allen Posted Wed Jun 28 17:07:15 BST 2000 by kinder surpise

I find him very sexy. He has a certain ruggedness doesn't he?


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Anonymous on Wed Jun 28 17:19:42 BST 2000:

Yes. I have just been watching a video of him. He was topless. According to Dawn French, he has 'small genitals'


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bent Halo on Wed Jun 28 21:22:49 BST 2000:

Have you not seen 'Shallow Grave'? Keith lolling on the bed, somewhat lacking.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Gee on Wed Jun 28 21:33:13 BST 2000:

Keith Allen is just another football obsessed Fanny Baker. Fat Les is nothing more than a Sun reader singalong. He should go find a corner and die in it.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Wed Jun 28 23:14:26 BST 2000:

I enjoyed his appearence on Jo Whiley's show - if only he hadn't been stuck with Ronan Keating and some bloke from 5ive.
"It wasn't like this in my day" - most of what he said sounded true to my ears, but he was destroyed by boy bands "we're just having a laugh"


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Gee on Thu Jun 29 12:38:17 BST 2000:

It can't be hard appearing interesting when you're sharing the spotlight with Keating and some spunker from 5ive pierced out of their mind. I thought Keith Allen came off badly because his arguments lacked articulation. Moreover it's all very well banging on about insignificant 'background' noise but when you're producing shit yourself (Fat Les) you sound like a silly prat.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By PJ on Thu Jun 29 17:13:53 BST 2000:

Thought about the Fat Les thing, but then realised Allen's probably mad enough to believe it (and football) is meaningful. I just like the fact he said what he thought - unlike every other guest on that show ever. He rose the usual boring level of the show to mildly intereasting.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Thu Jun 29 17:22:32 BST 2000:

>Have you not seen 'Shallow Grave'? Keith lolling on the bed, somewhat lacking.

Hmmm no I haven't but often camera angles can be deceptive Bent.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bent Halo on Thu Jun 29 18:15:21 BST 2000:

Was it super-imposed or something? I know it was a dark room.

They over-used red and blue in that film.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Thu Jun 29 19:50:07 BST 2000:

>Was it super-imposed or something? I know it was a dark room.
>
Perhaps he just has very matt genetalia that doesn't reflect low lighting Bent.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Fri Jun 30 07:14:05 BST 2000:

Keith Allen is a pointless individual, he has this arrogance as if he is so superior to his peers, but I've never seen him do anything remarkable that can't be attributed to Peter Richardson. Everything Allen has done apart from the Comic Strip has been substandard at least, and as for that emabarrassing appearance on Jo Whiley - if the man had any opinions or principles I certainly couldn't figure them out from what he was saying, and he kept on backing down and contradicting himself when challenged. Next to him, Ronan bloody Keating came across as a man who knew what he believed and knew how to express himself. Keith Allen is a fat ugly waste of space. With a tiny penis.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Fri Jun 30 09:51:00 BST 2000:

Don't make presumptions.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Fri Jun 30 18:28:40 BST 2000:

What presumptions? I expressed an opinion and backed it up with examples, then finished with a joke. Don't make vague, dull comments...


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Bent Halo on Fri Jun 30 18:46:11 BST 2000:

He was an arse with The Comic strip and refused to let them banner 'The Bullshitters' with the series opening caption. He compromised later for the follow-up and the deadly serious 'Crying Game'.

Peter Richardson is a better man, probably with a massive cock.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Fri Jun 30 19:15:37 BST 2000:

>Keith Allen is a pointless individual,

Opinon.

>he has this arrogance as if he is so superior to his peers,

Presumption.

>but I've never seen him do anything remarkable that can't be attributed to Peter Richardson.

Opinion/presumprion.

Everything Allen has done apart from the Comic Strip has been substandard at least,

Opinion.


>and as for that emabarrassing appearance on Jo Whiley - if the man had any opinions or principles I certainly couldn't figure them out from what he was saying,

Oh! Maybe that's because he didn't make any presumptions with them...

>and he kept on backing down and contradicting himself when challenged.

Anyone for a 'vague', 'dull' presumption?

>Next to him, Ronan bloody Keating came across as a man who knew what he believed and knew how to express himself.

Opinion probably biased by lust.

>Keith Allen is a fat ugly waste of space. With a tiny penis.

Lie.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Fri Jun 30 20:01:47 BST 2000:


What's your fucking problem then? Christ, lighten up.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Fri Jun 30 20:20:06 BST 2000:

>
>What's your fucking problem then? Christ, lighten up.

Insecurity - with a religious angle.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Gee on Fri Jun 30 21:05:26 BST 2000:

Watch out Ewar Woowar there's a nasty little surprise in this egg.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Fri Jun 30 21:45:24 BST 2000:

I wish it were the infamous and subject of dispute - cock of Keith Allen.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By dr_hackenbush on Fri Jun 30 21:45:41 BST 2000:

Keith Allen is deeply offensive. He does all this Fat Les stuff which is basically selling terrace chants back to the football supporters who came up with them in the first place. He faux-ironically exploits nationalistic feeling by dressing people up as Spitfires etc. And then he gets all narky on the Jo Whiley show about other people's lack of talent. (Not that I'd stick up for Ronan Keating).
And yes, this is just my opinion. In any field apart from mathematics, you can come back with the chant "oooooh, but that's JUST YOUR OPINION" as if that was some sort of substitute for reasoned argument.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Fri Jun 30 22:07:49 BST 2000:

But sometimes reason is substituted by something very delusional indeed! Like the want for someone's cock. Dr_Hackenbush please have all the opinions you can muster. I've always thought Ronan Keating was really the 'voice' in boyzone.

Keith Allen was great in that teen Rockstar show, though sadly shadowed by Denise Van Outen's cameo role.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Gee on Sat Jul 1 02:14:46 BST 2000:

>I had always believed that Keith Allen was packing some, whenever his name is mentioned people always say: "Big nob". I now realise that this may be some kind of reproach. But I shan't let this diminish my respect for him.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Sat Jul 1 10:01:48 BST 2000:

>
>Keith Allen was great in that teen Rockstar show, though sadly shadowed by Denise Van Outen's cameo role.

Bloody hell, was that an opinion? Well...almost. And I thought you were only here to pick holes in other people's opinions without actually putting forward your own. That's the first thing you've said about KA since you started this thread, and it was pretty non-committal. C'mon then, what's so great about him?


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surpirse on Sat Jul 1 11:05:06 BST 2000:

What is your obsession with 'opinions and evidence'? That obsession is what I was picking holes in. Opinions aren't that great you know. And why must the want for someones cock be justified logically?

His stubble is unkempt and sensual. There, will that do for you?


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Anonymous on Sat Jul 1 11:57:45 BST 2000:

surpirse?


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Sat Jul 1 14:28:11 BST 2000:

I don't give a shit how big his cock is, I wasn't the one who brought it up (no pun intended). I was merely saying that professionally he has never done anything of worth and in interview he comes across as arrogant and ignorant. His cock doesn't even come into it (again, no pun intended). Even if it was massive, it wouldn't justify the series of embarrassments and let-downs that has been his career. You can want it all you like, love, but you can't base your defence of his worth on lust alone.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Sat Jul 1 15:40:33 BST 2000:

>I was merely saying that professionally he has never done anything of worth and in interview he comes across as arrogant and ignorant. His cock doesn't even come into it (again, no pun intended).

Well there you are wrong. Have you not possibly considered that his cock is so large that perhaps he has a vast amount of testosterone flowing around his body and thus
it inhibits his performance in the work place? Maybe that wasn't arrogance you detected, maybe it was a rampant subconscious mating call. Perhaps he is using TV as a hankering for nubile wombs rather than setting out to create ground-breaking comedy. I bet you never considered that with your 'opinions'.




Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By Ewar Woowar on Sat Jul 1 18:12:30 BST 2000:

>
>Have you not possibly considered that his cock is so large that perhaps he has a vast amount of testosterone flowing around his body and thus
>it inhibits his performance in the work place?

Not after seeing Shallow Grave...

>Perhaps he is using TV as a hankering for nubile wombs rather than setting out to create ground-breaking comedy.

D'you know, you might have something there...


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Sat Jul 1 18:24:45 BST 2000:

>>
>>Have you not possibly considered that his cock is so large that perhaps he has a vast amount of testosterone flowing around his body and thus
>>it inhibits his performance in the work place?
>
>Not after seeing Shallow Grave...
>

Oh so you think he was an adept performer in this film and his cock proved only to add to the performance?

>>Perhaps he is using TV as a hankering for nubile wombs rather than setting out to create ground-breaking comedy.
>
>D'you know, you might have something there...
>
>

If this is the case he is the best in his trade! Every sexual millimeter of him.


Subject: Re: Keith Allen [ Previous Message ]
Posted By kinder surprise on Sat Jul 1 22:04:57 BST 2000:

*sings Jeurusalam to herself* he sure can make sexy music.


[ Add Your Comment On This Subject ]
[ Add Your Comment Quoting Message ]